Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video shows Utah nurse screaming, being dragged into police car...
Salt Lake Tribune ^ | August 31, 2017 | Pamela Manson

Posted on 09/01/2017 7:34:22 AM PDT by BobNative

A nurse says she was assaulted and illegally arrested by a Salt Lake City police detective for following a hospital policy that does not allow blood draws from unconscious patients.

Footage from University Hospital and officer body cameras shows Detective Jeff Payne and nurse Alex Wubbels in a standoff over whether the policeman should be allowed to get a blood sample from a patient who had been injured in a July 26 collision in northern Utah that left another driver dead.

Wubbels says blood cannot be taken from an unconscious patient unless the patient is under arrest, unless there is a warrant allowing the draw or unless the patient consents. The detective acknowledges in the footage that none of those requirements is in place, but he insists that he has the authority to obtain the draw, according to the footage.

(Excerpt) Read more at sltrib.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; assault; donutwatch; leo; nurse; police; psychocop; slc; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 381-388 next last
To: IYAS9YAS

re: “There’s absolutely no reason to draw blood from this person, no reason for him to be under arrest, and no reason for a warrant to be issued for a blood draw.”

The Police chase went very bad. The Cops were trying to get info to cover their asses!


121 posted on 09/01/2017 9:21:54 AM PDT by BobNative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Nope. The courts will side with the officer because he was “acting in good faith”. Yep.
____________________________________
Not saying this will apply, but there is case law that permits LEOs to act immediately in ‘exigent circumstances’ to preserve evidence of a crime without the need for a warrant. The officer can act to preserve the evidence if he reasonably believes evidence of a crime exists and delay in getting a warrant would result in loss of the evidence
122 posted on 09/01/2017 9:22:22 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
An explanation - including a call to her supervisor - would have gone a long way.

Her supervisor was ON THE PHONE on speakerphone when the incident happened. He told the cops he was wrong, and he was making a mistake by threatening a nurse. Then the cop exploded.

You could say he was under stress - but that nurse worked in a burn unit - you think she not under stress all the time?

That guy is a dangerous guy. He has no business in that job.

123 posted on 09/01/2017 9:23:23 AM PDT by Fido969 (IN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: pnz1
I wondered why none of the other officers present tried to diffuse the situation?

It's the "Us against Them" mentality. It is what has caused many honest, law abiding, tax paying citizens to lose respect for the badge.

124 posted on 09/01/2017 9:25:27 AM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JoeRed

There is so much wrong in this story, the cop should be fired and the nurse win a settlement.
1. When you are a patient in the hospital, the hospital will follow the law. That means a warrant for a blood draw. Otherwise, there are severe HIPAA violations and the hospital will be sued and the nurse will lose her license.
2. If there was a probable cause to obtain the blood, it would be easy for them to call a judge and get the warrant. The fact that they did not means they did not have probable cause. I would think that if there is a law stating that truck drivers need their blood drawn, it most likely would be when they are on work time. For all you know, he may not have been on the work clock at the time of the accident.
3. Some of you criticized her for screaming. If you had your arm twisted to your back, that would hurt. They were rough with her .
4. By forcing an ICU nurse off the floor , they endangered other patients by short staffing the unit.
This cop needs to be fired.


125 posted on 09/01/2017 9:25:50 AM PDT by kaila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

At least the Cop didn’t scream... “stop resisting!”


126 posted on 09/01/2017 9:26:56 AM PDT by BobNative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: z3n

“It takes a special kind of person to deal with the crap that they do and not want to take short-cuts and not to completely resent the people you are dealing with and trample their rights. It’s a very hard thing to do. I don’t think I could do it.”

One of my wife’s best friends married our town’s first chief of police. That was twenty years ago. He had a heart attack and had to retire. He just had his 80th birthday, and he still bears the “scars” of a life as a police officer. It has taken all of the past 20 years to get over the notion that “everyone is a potential lawbreaker,” and to try as best he can to absolve himself of some of the “extra legal” actions he took “on the job.” He’s even recently joined his wife’s church and got himself baptized. So you’re spot on with your comments.


127 posted on 09/01/2017 9:27:01 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

So my opinion on this had changed somewhat based on two things.

First, the officer asserts that he was instructed by his superior officer to arrest the nurse if she interfered. So, he wasn’t simply doing this because he was mad, as the video made it seem, but because he was following his own orders.

Secondly, the officer was actually trained to draw blood himself, so presumably he wasn’t trying to force the nurse to draw blood, he was simply trying to go and do it himself.

I still think the situation could have been handled much better, but it seems closer to possible obstruction now.


128 posted on 09/01/2017 9:27:38 AM PDT by caligatrux (Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: caligatrux

“She did not refuse to “allow” the blood test, she refused to do the blood test”

No, she refused to allow it. The police officer is a trained phlebotomist.

As far as the claim that the police didn’t explain it well enough, the article says that the police called the hospital ahead of time and the hospital basically refused to accept what the police told them.


129 posted on 09/01/2017 9:27:44 AM PDT by JoeRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: BobNative
Porter and Wubbels declined to release information about the patient, but Payne’s report identifies him as 43-year-old William Gray, a reserve officer in the Rigby, Idaho, Police Department, who suffered burns during a July 26 crash in Cache County.

And there it is. Police closing ranks to protect one of their own. As verified by this quote:

"Payne — who says he wanted the blood sample to protect the patient, not punish him — said he was advised by Lt. James Tracy, the watch commander on duty that night, to arrest Wubbels for interfering with a police investigation if she refused to let him get the sample, according to his report."

130 posted on 09/01/2017 9:28:42 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts ("Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment." - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
She had a hospital Admin on the speaker phone telling the cop “you’re making a mistake” which the cop totally ignored.

Oh, he didn't ignore it. Hearing that from the administrator was what actually set him off. "Me? A mistake? Time to crack skulls."

Threads like this generally leave me greatly disheartened for the future of our country. Not because of the dumbass jackboots - that is to be expected - but because of the inexplicable eagerness of so many Freepers to kneel in abject submission before the State. The truth is that all of the legalistic wrangling about whether section 84.23a requires a blood test or not doesn't matter at all. What is important is that a cop arrested a nurse, and very aggressively at that, who was simply working her shift and doing her job as she understood it. In a sane world where rule of law still governed, the cops would have resolved the issue, misunderstanding or no, administratively. The unconscious guy sure as hell wasn't going anywhere. Instead, the goofball decided to go full SS jackboot. If we are going to have a dispute like this, the error should always be in favor of liberty and civilized behavior, not the terrorizing of citizens doing their jobs.
131 posted on 09/01/2017 9:28:55 AM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: BobNative

There’s gotta be some reason to take the blood, and there has to be a protection of the unconscious blood giver. A judge has to approve it.


132 posted on 09/01/2017 9:29:41 AM PDT by batterycommander (I learned my Artillery skills from the United States Marines. USNA 65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeRed

Yes, I am beginning to see that there is more to the story here than I thought.


133 posted on 09/01/2017 9:30:06 AM PDT by caligatrux (Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: JoeRed

It does not matter that he is a trained phlebotomist. He is not an employee of the hospital, therefore he has no rights to perform a medical procedure on a patient. A hospital is not going to allow any Tom, Dick and Harry to walk in off the street to administer a medical procedure on a patient. They may be able to draw blood at a police station for DUI, but not in a hospital.


134 posted on 09/01/2017 9:31:20 AM PDT by kaila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: JoeRed

In the 18 minute video after she is in the police car another officer is talking to her.. I thought she said they had drawn blood on the patient when he arrived.. also that they had already given him something to keep him comfortable (I am assuming pain meds)


135 posted on 09/01/2017 9:32:09 AM PDT by pnz1 (#IMNOTWITHHER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Mears

“They????

It was ONE cop,one.”

Not true! The cop had his watch commander on the phone. And let’s not forget the University “door shakers” in uniform who stood idly by an allowed this illegal arrest to continue. They should have intervened, as they are sworn officers and the university is their turf. If anyone needed to be cuffed and lead away, it was the SLC PD detective.


136 posted on 09/01/2017 9:32:28 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: BobNative

The perp in all this was one Marcos Torres. Illegal alien?


137 posted on 09/01/2017 9:32:45 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobNative

May the hospital draw blood from an unconscious person for medical reasons?


138 posted on 09/01/2017 9:34:53 AM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaila

“It does not matter that he is a trained phlebotomist. He is not an employee of the hospital, therefore he has no rights to perform a medical procedure on a patient. A hospital is not going to allow any Tom, Dick and Harry to walk in off the street to administer a medical procedure on a patient. They may be able to draw blood at a police station for DUI, but not in a hospital.”

lol


139 posted on 09/01/2017 9:36:25 AM PDT by JoeRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

That wreck was horrific. I saw the perp’s vehicle swerve in front of the semi leaving the semi driver no reaction time. I can’t tell from the video, but am curious if it’s been determined whether or not the severe swerve by the perp was caused by a PIT maneuver done by the police.


140 posted on 09/01/2017 9:37:14 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 381-388 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson