To: TigerLikesRooster
Quantum computing encryption is decades away. I do not think this is real. So China would allow people to communicate anonymously?
2 posted on
08/19/2017 2:02:32 AM PDT by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
To: TigerLikesRooster; Salamander; JoeProBono
Unbreakable?
OK.
Just as long as it’s not inscrutable.
4 posted on
08/19/2017 2:31:28 AM PDT by
shibumi
(Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
To: TigerLikesRooster; Salamander; JoeProBono
Does it depend on orientation?
5 posted on
08/19/2017 2:33:02 AM PDT by
shibumi
(Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
if china wants to believe it is unbreakable and the US can break the inscription you can bet we will not hear about it from the government.
7 posted on
08/19/2017 2:35:27 AM PDT by
PCPOET7
To: TigerLikesRooster
Is that anything like an unisnkable ship?
Wish I knew how to add pictures.
10 posted on
08/19/2017 3:00:18 AM PDT by
dp0622
(The Left should know that if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Did their spys steal it from us or did Obama give it to them?
Either way it’s just a challenge to the hackavists.
14 posted on
08/19/2017 3:16:25 AM PDT by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: TigerLikesRooster
Wikileaks released the contents of the call-—
Gimmee one wonton soup, 2 order egg roll, one numba 18.
And a large numba 3, no MSG.
15 posted on
08/19/2017 3:16:47 AM PDT by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
It’s only unbreakable until someone goes straight through Falken’s Maze. :-P
39 posted on
08/19/2017 5:33:00 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
To: TigerLikesRooster
In the June 16, 2017, issue of Science, Yin et al. report setting a new quantum entanglement distance record of 1203km, demonstrating the survival of a 2-photon pair and a violation of a Bell inequality, reaching a CHSH valuation of 2.37 ± 0.09, under strict Einstein locality conditions, from the Micius satellite to bases in Lijian, Yunnan and Delingha, Quinhai, increasing the efficiency of transmission over prior fiberoptic experiments by an order of magnitude.
42 posted on
08/19/2017 5:40:56 AM PDT by
bruoz
To: TigerLikesRooster
Look, we’re busy taking down statues that offend morons and fighting for the rights of confused and depraved males to share a bathroom with your wives and daughters. Ain’t nobody got time for no quantum nonsense. It is probably racist, anyway.
/s
49 posted on
08/19/2017 6:28:30 AM PDT by
bk1000
(A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Did anyone ask if the message actually said anything, or was it unbreakable because no one can make gibberish coherent?
60 posted on
08/19/2017 9:01:06 AM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Chinese military bump for later....
61 posted on
08/19/2017 9:43:40 AM PDT by
indthkr
To: TigerLikesRooster
Hack proof communications sounds like a dare game on ?.
63 posted on
08/19/2017 10:12:26 AM PDT by
Vaduz
(women and children to be impacted the most.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
“20 orders of magnitude more efficient than an optical fiber”
hmmm. 20 orders of magnitude is roughly equivalent to 20 x 10, i.e., 200 times more “efficient” than optical fiber, so does that mean roughly 200 times the speed of light then? not to mention optical fiber can carry dozens of independent streams at near the speed of light, not something cheap or easy to do with radio spectrum.
64 posted on
08/19/2017 12:16:46 PM PDT by
catnipman
( Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
67 posted on
08/19/2017 2:20:52 PM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: TigerLikesRooster
Another day another Chinese-technology-superiority story. Their huge dam is a disaster and their bridges fall down daily.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson