Posted on 08/17/2017 5:49:19 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Abraham Lincoln has joined George Washington on the list of those targeted by Chicagoans in a national debate over Civil War-era monuments.
Alderman Raymond Lopez took to Facebook Wednesday night to decry a defaced statue of the nations 16th president in the Englewood neighborhood. The giant bust appears to have been damaged after someone in the 15th Ward sprayed and ignited a flammable liquid.
What an absolute disgraceful act of vandalism. This bust of Abraham Lincoln, erected by Phil Bloomquist on August 31, 1926, was damaged & burned, Mr. Lopez wrote, a local NBC affiliate reported. If anyone has any information regarding this act, please contact the police or my office immediately.
F- Abe Lincoln, responded Quintin Mitchell, whose comment was liked or deemed funny by 160 others.
The officials finding came just one day after President Trump stated opposition to tearing down memorials related to Americas past with slavery.
I wonder is it George Washington next week and is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You know, you really do have to ask yourself, where does it stop? Mr. Trump asked reporters on Tuesday while addressing violence in Virginia.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
By 1770 Franklin had freed all of his slaves.
Just think of the poor snowflakes having to see slave owners on their money...
I guess that explains why there’s a move to go digital
Oh my Holy God. What is happening?? I woke up one day and overnight my country has turned into the Twilight Zone. What is this mass mental illness that has afflicted the West??
of the signers of the Declaration, of those that we know their views on slavery, there were more abolitionists than slavery apologists.
The people who are asserting their virtue today by denouncing the Confederacy don't know how they would have acted if they had been alive in the 1850-1865 period. If they had been slave owners would they have freed their slaves and adopted a life of poverty for themselves and their families?
The slaveholding aristocracy was so entrenched in power in the slave states that it was hard to imagine how the institution could be ended. Delaware was a slave state with only a few thousand slaves (more "free persons of color" than slaves there) but even during the war the slaveholders resisted very strongly any effort to end slavery there. When West Virginia broke away from Virginia, they did not free the slaves but only adopted a plan for gradual emancipation (to benefit black people born after a certain date, not those already enduring slavery).
thank you. Great additional detail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.