I tend to veer away from “Stalinist” because it becomes so Communist centric. (Centric is not a valid word, but it works for me here. I think of it as Communist “focused”.
We grew up in a time when Communism was the buggy-man. Many of us are still caught up in that mindset. That’s not particularly bad, but I do want people to think in terms of purges, singling people and movements out for elimination.
While Stalin and his movement did this, I think folks can identify with Hitler and his purges better.
Hitler’s followers singled a number of peoples out and sought to exterminate them.
That’s what we’re facing if we don’t get this back under control.
The sad thing is, this is zooming right past the folks in control. I don’t think the Trump team even sees this on the radar.
They need to get up to speed and start going after Soros and the seditious people he is financing.
This is moving toward the point of no return. The press is playing along, and nobody is fighting back in government circles.
They have to soon.
Look at the atmosphere concerning Whites at our universities. It’s almost Hitlarian. This has got to be confronted.
Sessions should be all over this by now.
Apparently you are unaware that most of what we're up against today is indeed the product of communists. From the organizers of the (anti-police) Black Lives Matter and anti-Trump movements to the assault on nearly every aspect of traditional American culture. In fact, they've gotten so powerful and influential in *recent* times that they actually managed to grab the White House -- for 8 long years.
Way past that point. What you have described is the new left. I understand why you are reticent about calling it Stalinist instead of Fascist. But as we all know, those were both leftist movements. They both fit the definition which is man's subservience to the state. The were mainly superficial differences between the two. When the communists fought the fascists in Germany in 1930 those were two leftists movements battling for power.
Our leftism has many facets. One is corporatism. Getting rid of Soros won't help much because the Chamber of Commerce is a bigger problem. The insurance companies are all in on Obamacare. Why? Because they all want to offer an elaborate expensive product that the government mandates. We have corporation run prisons. Sure they save money and reduce the government. But they exert pressure to stay full. But how do we get law and order without prisons? Stop illegal immigration, stop promoting single mothers, stop the breakdown of religion and family. Trump is keenly aware of those problems.
Another facet of our leftism is antihuman groupthink. Chris Plante, local but now syndicated talk show host always says "the left doesn't care what you do, as long as it is mandatory". What he really means is the left doesn't care what you think, as long as it is mandatory.
As a prominent example, we are required to worship homosexuality. Not just tolerate the occasional gay guy who has been around forever at the edges of society. But regularize the deviancy of abnormal "sexual intercourse". Of course it is not that at all, just a form of mutual abuse. It is antihuman. But it helps the left immensely to take over and gain power.
One goal of the groupthink is the demonization of their enemies like Bannon, Gorka, etc along with Trump. It wouldn't matter in the least if Bannon was a homosexual Jew. He is an enemy. It doesn't matter that Trump's daughter and son-in-law are Jews. They are enemies of the left.
I'm not sure our extermination is their goal. I think it is just a tool. We have to be exterminated if we are in the way. But if we surrender, give up our weapons, and promise to be good dhimmis we might not be exterminated. I guess it depends on whether you see the left as more dangerous than Islam. Sure Islam has growing pains. When they move into an area they kill lots of people very gruesomely. But once they consolidate power, like the Saudis, society is repressed but stable.
Chris Plante also points out that the left has killed far more humans than anyone else. Far more than the Nazis, far more than the Islamists. The question is once the fascists, Islamists or leftists take power how do they maintain power? It's simple for all three, they kill people. Corporate fascists don't need to kill as many because people can adapt to their repression and live in relative prosperity. Islamists can generally cut down on their killing once they have consolidated power.
But the left doesn't have a stable economic model. Corporate communism (Chicomm style) will eventually implode. The decisions by the Central Committee will always be vastly inferior and undermine the economy. The Chinese made up for that with mercantilism, but that only gets them closer to the bottom in a race to the bottom in wages, environment, etc.
An example from the West is Sweden. Sweden can't sustain their leftism. They have a nice standard of living and women have stopped reproducing. As a result of cultural leftism they just imported a million Muslims. The official number (from the government) is 140,000 Muslims, but they just added 150,000 in one year alone. A better estimate is 10 times that. In a few decades they will be "peaceful" Islamic dictatorship or a violent leftist gulag or a combination of the two.
Academics, pundits and politicians who say that they oppose racism...
...eagerly tell one group, and one group only, that their race is innately toxic.