Posted on 08/13/2017 5:20:44 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Pulled Tweet By Hill Reporter:
Anyway several police officers at the station here think the guy running people down wasnt malicious. They said the driver was scared
CACHE of Pulled Tweet By The Hill Reporter
Taylor Lorenz (@TaylorLorenz)
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:-18I2l2UC9UJ:https://twitter.com/TaylorLorenz/status/896444548171182080+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
It’s a Mopar, baby.
If I didn’t keep one foot on the brake while flooring my Hemi, I’d hit warp drive and/or get whiplash.
:D
/Sammy Hagar wept
In the video linked to in post #8, one can clearly see people moving quickly out of the driver’s way before someone runs out and hits the rear end of the car with what appears to be a baseball bat. The driver instigated the attack on himself by the way he was driving. And I am unaware of any other vehicle being attacked that day.
Just going by this video he could be found innocent of all charges. Maybe even given a key to the city. Okay, maybe not that, but certainly acquitted.
Gotta figure to a 20 yo guy with emotional issues, probably self esteem issues, he views that car as an extension of himself. It’s his pride and joy. So he’s driving down this street with all these people to show it off, at least that’s what might have been going on in his mind, but then all of sudden people start hitting the car with rocks and whatever so he floors it to get away but instead of getting away he runs into more people and hits a car he didn’t see because all the people were illegally in the road trying to hit him.
To him hitting his car is the same thing as hitting his person, his body, he’s that attached to the car.
I can see this as one possible affirmative self defense action by a good attorney. Show all the dings and things the anarchists did to his baby and there it is; innocent.
I just can’t see any 20 yo young man trashing his pride and joy on a bunch of fascist anarchists who the world would be better off without but not by his hand. I’m just not seeing it. I didn’t see it the second I heard and saw the first videos come through. Innocent due to panic and being attacked.
The people to blame for the death of the woman and the injuries are those who were on the street trying to hurt him and his car. Find them and charge them.
I don’t believe in any of that Nazi stuff but I also don’t believe in white shaming or what they call it; white privilege. To me; all of it is equally ridiculous and bad.
The overhead video from the drone shows a red minivan plowing through the crowd. It definitely looks like it's hitting people. The end of that video shows the minivan in the intersection, with the light silver car with the black top behind.
Who were the drivers of those two cars?
If two other cars drove through the mob just before Field's Challenger did, that seems kinda important.
The answer to your second question: The police skedaddled. They felt the situation was too dangerous.
Sooth2222 wrote:
“’This is an overhead vid; save it...’
The video shows a dark red minivan plowing through the crowd, (and apparently running over some individuals). The later shot shows the minivan in the intersection, behind it is the white or silver car with the black top which appears to be the one that the Challenger crashed into, with damage to the rear.”
Two cars were ran into people, but only one driver is being held.
Where’s the driver on that red van?
Thanks for the ping, grampa Dave!
I had that exact same thought, why was there video of it, from the ground?
Aerial vid I can understand, there being a chopper in the area...
—and— there was a drone too...
—plus— that chopper went down...
This has the stench of psyops/false flag/deep state all over it...
Nope -- somebody else wrote that! (But it's true!)
It seems strange that if THREE cars drove through the crowd that only the THIRD car was doing so as An Act of Terrorism.
(Incidentally, I'm beginning to think that people rarely even look at the videos they post. I tried a news search for information about the red minivan and the silver/black sedan. Nothing.)
I haven’t followed all the coverage of this, but judging by what I’ve seen from the hate-Trump media it’s more likely than not that this young man was just in the wrong place at the wrong time - and made a bad decision.
You know what I see in that video?
I see leftist mob behavior.
Makes no difference whether I agree or disagree with neo-nazis, alt-right, or whatever they call them.
I happen to think leftists are much more dangerous than the people they were committing violence against. But I, and conservatives like me, would do nothing like these leftists do. We believe in freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, even though we despise and detest what our opponents stand for.
What we see here, with people being bussed in, signs being printed, high end cameras appearing, is that this is being orchestrated.
This is leftist mob behavior. Very few of these individuals would ever stand on their own to oppose someone in the way they do. But in a mob, they take joy in it. They are all smiles.
They think this is a great big game.
People get killed doing this.
Before or after he drove over people?
BFL
Until someone shows convincing evidence, I am assuming this person was afraid. One has only to imagine "Blackhawk Down" from seeing the leftist mob violence taking place everywhere else in this city in a variety of videos.
You should watch the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzhqO3iYlxk&feature=youtu.be&t=6595
It sure looks to me like people are being attacked in those videos.
If they identify the drivers of the red minivan and the silver/black sedan that drove through the mob first (and the police must have the cars, since they were damaged so needed to be towed) and they say they were frightened by the mob, An Act of Terrorism is going to be very difficult to prove.
True. Unless someone shouts out a Perry Mason-like confession of guilt, it is hard to prove.
In the incidents of muslim terrorism I see, I regard the “Allah Akbar” proclamation as a Perry Mason-like confession of guilt.
But otherwise, I despise hate crime legislation. Not because I support hate crime, but for two reasons: First, there are laws on the books against crimes that should be charged and enforced. Secondly, determining what is going on in someone’s mind at a given time is problematic.
Even if someone has expressed sympathy with radical views in some way, trying to link it to a given act is an assumption, not proven...unless they shout out “Allah Akbar” as they pull the trigger.
You don’t think the possibility exists that if the car was stopped by the thugs they could break a window and pull him out and beat him or worse? I think it is pretty likely. It has happened, to Reginald Denny- we all saw it on TV. Denny barely survived.
The same groups that were blocking the street have assaulted people that do not agree with them. Assaulted people with deadly weapons like a bicycle lock. They always seem to have weapons of some sort at their riots.
I have been expecting those groups to pull people from cars and beat them. If I encounter a group like that blocking me from getting through I would keep going. I would try my best to not hit anyone but I truly would not stop.
I do not know enough to truly know if the man was trying to run over them, I would never support that. If he was trying to drive out of the area and they blocked him while acting aggressive, he very well may have panicked.
Thanks for finding the possible/probable CIA link or former CIA link.
Oh, Gee, I dunno. Maybe 500 antifa thugs with weapons? No, that can’t be it. Maybe getting home late for supper? No, that can’t be it. Maybe he had to pee.
Exactly where is he supposed to “deviate” to, when there are buildings on both sides?
I know many people who drive like idiots, before hitting the brakes late. Do you know this drivers typical driving techniques and habits?
My point is that it looks like he accelerated after his car was hit or at least swung at by someone. Was there other damage done to the other side or from the front (where we can’t see)?
You, like the prosecutor, have decided that this guy is a “bad guy”; therefore, he MUST HAVE done this on purpose. Fact is, he may have done just that very thing. BUT, your longer video does NOT prove that he INTENDED to injure or kill anyone.
I’m not defending his actions, nor the actions of the idiots around him, but you have decided to crucify him based on YOUR opinion. And then your defense is he didn’t “deviate from his path” on a narrow street, with buildings on both sides, and people all around? Okay,
There is video on twitter of both the red minivan and the silver sedan immediately after the crash. The minivan shows damage to the driver's side second door absolutely consistent with being bashed in by Antifa.
The video also shows two women exiting the van through the passenger door, and also several Antifa types reaching in the driver's side window of the silver sedan, whose driver appears to be a young African-American woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.