In that (for some strange reason green tinted image) you can clearly see where the partly brown exhaust extractor, having been ripped from where it was fastened to the fuselage, is now floating above the nose of the sinking aircraft. You can also see a portion of the damaged luggage pod, almost in two pieces, floating against the aircraft as it is lifted by the wind, in the region where the greatest water turbulence was. The reason you see the suitcase close to the swimmer is that this portion of the luggage pod obviously didn't disintegrate and release the large suitcase itself until after the aircraft had come to a stop.
Ferdinand Puentes image doesn't have that green tint, but then, he wasn't trying to tell us what he filmed was some mystery personnel lurking near the nose of the Cessna, and a some sort of green flotation device...and btw, while I remember, whatever happened to the theory that the aircraft we were shown from which the passengers made their exit, wasn't really the same aircraft which was photographed from the air after it had landed in the water?
Whoops! Now you got me. I have to buy the book to find out, don't I? Not a chance. I am reading The Real Global Warming Disaster written by Christopher Booker at the moment, now there's a fascinating fraud well worth the time, I highly recommend it.
Images with the “Ferdinand Puentes” label on them are ABC’s low-quality images. You should not base analysis on that, now that the NTSB has higher-quality footage that can be looked at. Unless you’ve looked at that higher-quality footage you really can’t say much.
At this point, the knowledge we have about what is in these images does not rest on anything I’ve said or thought. At this point WE HAVE INVOLVED PEOPLE WHO HAVE CONFIRMED WHAT THESE ITEMS ARE. If you’re still harping on what I did or didn’t see then you are (willfully?) lagging way behind the times. This isn’t about me, except to those who have the same philosophy of personal destruction as the deep state crooks have in their psy-ops. As of yet, nobody arguing with us has even ACKNOWLEDGED that important piece of information.
Do you think you have more knowledge about the exhaust extractor and luggage pod than the aviation personnel who put these things together, or the investigators who analyze safety issues and wreckage from crashes? Because that’s who you’re arguing with. Sure, call me a crazy loser if you want. I’m sure that would make you feel real good, and you might even think you are convincing on-lookers not to listen to me. But that doesn’t change what the experts have identified from these images.
It doesn’t change the noise analysis from the audio - audio which was provably altered by somebody at ABC in an effort to hide what is transparent from the NTSB’s audio. It doesn’t change the gauge showing fuel being fed to an engine that had supposedly died. It doesn’t change the pilot’s shifting that only makes sense if the engine was running, as the audio and gauges indicated was the case.
To have all that evidence and STILL choose to argue about what I did or didn’t think I saw way back when... is to make this all about me. Which is what the deep state always does. They make it about a person so they can destroy that person and think they’re done with it. If we as a society continue to let that tactic work, then we as a society deserve exactly what we get - and it ain’t gonna be pretty. Unless and until we become an EVIDENCE-BASED people, we are a post-modern wreck, where people decide their own “truth” and nobody can know anything.