Indeed I do. But this is just another of your feeble attempts at creating doubts within things that I have noted have already been verified by the experts and on-scene people. Their testimony would stand up in court, while your mere conjectures would not have the credibility to stand without hard evidence.
You attempt to spin conjectures into theories without evidence (e.g., your inference that the flotsam is just my imagination and that there's no evidence to back itup, or your conjecture about an exhaust extractor on some green Caravan somewhere, several posts back. The picture in my post #173 is picture #5 as shown in the MCP extract below, thus my evidence is fully supported, for which I didn't earlier drag in the support image and logical paradigm. I was merely tailoring what I said to the person (you) that claimed "less is more," which you apparently treat with a personal ethical relativism.
That picture of the "flotsam" was supplied by the Maui County Police as part of their incident report! MCP identified it as part of the Fuddy Crash. So all your attempts at inserting doubt deserve simply to disappear. Similarly, the doubts you've attempted to interject about the green SEAL transport deserve to disappear. Your imagined evidence of what an exhaust extractor as you posted in a differently-equipped Caravan in posts #158 and #161 simply deserve only to disappear, as they are not relevant evidence. Though you've said about the bottom of your green Caravan image and the " 'slip and slide' thingamajig", "I would dare to say that both items are a colour-match." that's all wrong and not relevant evidence. Your doubts do not make for contrary evidence. None of those played a part in this crash.
Butterdezillion talks of a the likelihood of Fuddy having gotten make-over, which would be entirely Standard Operating Procedure for a person the authorities want to be able to start a new life, and all you can do, as in your post #150, is act as if she talked about a "re-engineering .. a new life form" as you show an apparently engineered creature from the deep. You, as 4Zoltan, HG and others are not seriously working toward the truth of this event. You are exercising the politics of personal destruction. Those kinds of responses are not normal interactions between conservatives. (And please spare us all the, "Well, you deserve it-type comments.")
Your memory of what you may think I've said is obviously confused. Just as with the "flotsam," you would try to attack it as if we don't know it came from the plane as if Grand Caravan parts regularly wash up on Molokai beaches and the MCP don't supply pictures when they're part of their Incident report as part of a UIPA request.
