Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ warns the media could be targeted in crackdown on leaks
The Hill ^ | 08/04/2017 | Jonathan Easley

Posted on 08/04/2017 5:28:09 PM PDT by ForYourChildren

Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Friday announced a government-wide crackdown on leakers, which will include a review of the Justice Department’s policies on subpoenas for media outlets that publish sensitive information.



At a press conference with Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, Sessions announced that the Justice Department, FBI and government intelligence agencies will direct more resources into the investigations of government leaks and would prioritize prosecuting those that pass sensitive information along to the press or foreign officials.

Sessions said he had empowered his deputy director Rod Rosenstein and incoming FBI director Christopher Wray to oversee the classified leaks investigations and to monitor the progress of each case.

The national security division of the Justice Department will prioritize cases involving unauthorized disclosures, Sessions said, and the departments “will not hesitate to bring lawful and appropriate criminal charges against those who abuse the public trust.”

{..snip..}

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agsessions; doj; enemywithin; leaks; media; msm; sessions; trump; trumpdoj; trumpmedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 08/04/2017 5:28:09 PM PDT by ForYourChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Wow, a stern warning!


2 posted on 08/04/2017 5:30:49 PM PDT by proust (Trump / Pence 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
Will not give credit to a credit less person. Session has done damn little for Trump and will drag his feet on the leaks.
3 posted on 08/04/2017 5:32:01 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
Will not give credit to a credit less person. Session has done damn little for Trump and will drag his feet on the leaks.
4 posted on 08/04/2017 5:32:42 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
Yeah, the FBI will take care of everything.../sarcasm


5 posted on 08/04/2017 5:36:41 PM PDT by LIConFem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Have a little faith, will ya? Things don’t always happen on FReeper schedule.


6 posted on 08/04/2017 5:41:03 PM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Now yer talkin.


7 posted on 08/04/2017 5:41:28 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Revoke their credentials, and sic the IRS on them.

And with all the wailing over NSA “wiretapping” since 9/11, the NSA would/should have the info on who is leaking what to whom wouldn’t they?


8 posted on 08/04/2017 5:41:47 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Democrats... BETRAYING America since 1828.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Bad idea.

#FirstAmendment


9 posted on 08/04/2017 5:42:15 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Can’t yell fire in a crowded theater. Same goes for knowingly publishing “news” that risks national security or individual lives.


10 posted on 08/04/2017 5:44:56 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

What a joke. 1st amendment bozo!!


11 posted on 08/04/2017 5:50:00 PM PDT by raiderboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2CAVTrooper

Have to clean out the IRS first.


12 posted on 08/04/2017 5:52:49 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2CAVTrooper
"And with all the wailing over NSA “wiretapping” since 9/11, the NSA would/should have the info on who is leaking what to whom wouldn’t they?"

It's probably someone within the NSA producing these RECORDINGS and providing them to the media.

My guess is that it was the RECORDINGS sent to the media. The delay in their release was because it took time to transcribe those recordings into text.

13 posted on 08/04/2017 5:54:23 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Feminism DESTROYED females)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

I’ll take this seriously when we start seeing the deep state leakers and their vile media counterparts being frog marched in hand cuffs to the paddy wagons.


14 posted on 08/04/2017 5:55:35 PM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
First Amendment my a$$. If you are party to leaking classified information you can't wave away your crime by saying you are a reporter.

A few years in supermax and maybe some of these twink reporters will be willing to sing about who on the inside is feeding them this classified info.

15 posted on 08/04/2017 5:56:52 PM PDT by Newbomb Turk (Hey Newbomb, where is your bothers ElCamino ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Let me know when he arrests Comey for his illegal leaking


16 posted on 08/04/2017 5:57:18 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20

+1. Actions speak louder than sternly worded letters. We are way past that stage.


17 posted on 08/04/2017 5:57:37 PM PDT by proust (Trump / Pence 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
You're wrong on both counts.

Can’t yell fire in a crowded theater.

You forgot the word "falsely", too. Schenck v. United States is the SCOTUS case which famously includes the phrase "falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater". The "falsely shouting fire" phrase was dicta, meaning it never was law. Furthermore, Schenck v. United States was overturned in 1969 by Brandenburg v. Ohio. So even if "falsely shouting fire" was prohibited at one time, it hasn't been in nearly the past 50 years since Brandenburg.

Same goes for knowingly publishing “news” that risks national security or individual lives.

The lawbreaker in a leaking case is the leaker, not the recipient of the leak. See New York Times Co. v. United States.

18 posted on 08/04/2017 5:59:11 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

You can force them to give the source or sour in jail until they do. They can’t be arrested for publishing the info though.


19 posted on 08/04/2017 5:59:24 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

That is true.


20 posted on 08/04/2017 6:00:12 PM PDT by raiderboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson