Posted on 07/22/2017 3:22:13 PM PDT by george76
Data Show Counties in 11 States Have More Registered Voters than Eligible Adult Citizens.
...
The 11 states are: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Tennessee. The states have 90 days after receiving the letters to address the problem and provide Judicial Watch documentation showing that they have conducted a “statewide effort to conduct a program that reasonably ensures the lists of eligible voters are accurate.” Judicial Watch informed the states that should they fail to take action to correct violations of Section 8 of the NVRA, it would file suit.
Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act requires states to make a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from official lists due to “the death of the registrant” or “a change in the residence of the registrant,” and requires states to ensure noncitizens are not registered to vote.
...
Judicial Watch asked the states to “conduct or implement a systematic, uniform, nondiscriminatory program to remove from the list of eligible voters the names of persons who have become ineligible to vote by reason of a change of residence, death or a disqualifying criminal conviction.” The states are also asked to remove from voter registration lists “noncitizens who have registered to vote unlawfully.”
“Dirty election rolls can mean dirty elections,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These 11 states face possible Judicial Watch lawsuits unless they follow the law and take reasonable steps to clean up their voting rolls of dead, moved, and non-citizen voters.”
(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ...
So when are they going to sue California?
40% of the votes cast in this state are double/triple votes for dems, or cast by wetbacks (illegal aliens) , or the dead or moved away.
Election day also moved to the first Tuesday after April 15. Lots of stuff would be changed, fast.
Wonder if any leads would turn-up using the addresses on Google Maps or Apples and match those with the voter rolls.
Sure would be funny to use the Left’s technology to show the obvious fraud.
Fancy cars parked in front of welfare recipient’s address of record.
The list goes on and on...
Georgia - supposedly a 'purple' state this election. Florida, the same for a while. North Carolina, too. Illinois, reliably corrupt. Can anyone explain Iowa being a swing state? New York and New Jersey - see Illinois. The rest are not big fish, and are perhaps even just cover (in as much as any state is free of voter fraud).
At a later point we will see more lawsuits covering more states - if this flies. The big prizes are the states that Trump swiped from Clinton - Michigan, Pennsylvania, etc., that have probably been voter frauded away for the past half dozen elections. Even California is on the table - take away the illegal vote and California is not so reliably Democratic any more.
I live in Minnesota, where Al Franken was elected by a car trunk full of "newly discovered" ballots, nearly all of which, shockingly, were for him.
One of my first voting experiences was in Illinois. The device reminded me of a giant abacus with little paddles next to the candidate’s name and a big level that was pulled when you finished.
Lots of noise and gears clicking. I will never know who really got my vote or if the gears were even engaged.
Certainly, there was no record for audit purposes. The fix was already “in.”
Incentive
One of my kids is still on the rolls after 20 years of absence from the state.
No amount of griping and fussing seems to phase the registrar of voters.
I am surprised Tennessee is on the list unless it is because of the Democrat strongholds like Memphis and Nashville both are run by Democrats.
Thank you Judicial Watch...........
Somewhere, Al Franken just sighed with relief.
In KS, when or if the RINOs win the Primary races beating the conservative, they lose out to the real liberal, a democrat!
So much for no need to clean up voter registrations in Red States!
During an August Primary election here I'm Kansas, I found that one precinct list alone, had 8 different registered voters (4 adult couples with different last names, 2 adults shown were in late 80s to low 90s, 2 adults were in their mid to late 70s and one couple in their 30s/40s) in a three bedroom 1-1/2 bath ranch home.
Knowing it was virtually impossible for 8 different couples to be residing in this home and suspecting the older couple might have died or moved to assisted living and a similar possibility for the second, I believed that only two voters should be all that belonged on our rolls.
Good points
Some I had forgotten about until you mentioned them
By the most recent election that had finally dropped down to myself and spouse.
But in the most recent election, the Canvassing Board refused to certify the election tallies, citing 40 precincts that turned in more ballots than registered voters.
They were overruled by the Secretary of State, on the basis that the discrepancies were not large enough to affect the election results. On a Statewide level that was probably true.
But every one of the tax and bond issues for the County passed by razor-thin margins after the last few batches of "votes" were counted.
Things that make one go - HMMM?
......and your state is?
Not one of the eleven listed states.
Which is the whole point of the reply.
Vote fraud is a lot more common and effective in more places than people want to accept.
Democrats have become dependent on it to win close elections.
Both parties know it and occasionally benefit from it.
Democrats couldn't win many times without it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.