Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump is blasted for 'repugnant' request for voter records to 'indulge his fantasy that ...
(UK) Daily Mail ^ | July 4, 2017 | Chris Pleasance

Posted on 07/04/2017 5:14:44 AM PDT by Zakeet

Complete Headline: Trump is blasted for 'repugnant' request for voter records to 'indulge his fantasy that he won the popular vote' as 41 states refuse to comply

President Trump has been blasted for requesting sensitive voter data as 41 states ruled out handing the information over.

So far just three states - Colorado, Tennessee and Missouri - have agreed, while three more are considering it and another three say they have not received the request.

Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh was particularly scathing in his refusal, calling the request illegal and 'repugnant'.

In a statement, Mr Frosh said the request was 'designed only to intimidate voters and indulge President Trump's fantasy that he won the popular vote'.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; electioneering; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Zakeet

I am confident hitlery received 25 percent or less of the vote. Am also confident that had all the votes been legal that hitlery would have won at most two states. Yes, voter fraud is rampant


41 posted on 07/04/2017 6:28:33 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (There is no difference between liberals/moslems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

The request was for nothing that is not already available under public record. There goes Trump again, smokin out the rats. One would have thought these goof-balls might have figured it out by now. But nooooo, even with CNN and MSNBC taking the credibility hammering, they just can’t bring themselves to accept the fact that the media is no longer in that arena one would call credible.


42 posted on 07/04/2017 6:30:10 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

President Trump did not ask for information on how people voted.

He asked for those on the voter rolls.

IIRC, this is readily available public information and should be.

“Secret” voter rolls would make elections totally corrupt and fraudulent.


43 posted on 07/04/2017 6:31:22 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Isn’t voter registration data public information?


44 posted on 07/04/2017 6:31:43 AM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nfldgirl

Including Gov Abbott of Texas.


45 posted on 07/04/2017 6:42:47 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners., tea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

That are all citing their state symbol as the reason. Crabs, gulf, Bourbon.


46 posted on 07/04/2017 6:46:17 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

I wondered about this too. I may be wrong, but didn’t the commission ask for social security numbers too? Are those publicly available with my voter information as well? Does anybody know?


47 posted on 07/04/2017 6:47:04 AM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse

There is a bar code attached to my state’s ballots. Being that voting is government run would believe they know our numbers


48 posted on 07/04/2017 6:50:43 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (There is no difference between liberals/moslems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives
Isn’t voter registration data public information?

Not quite, but I'll bet every State GOP Committee has the spreadsheet for their entire state.

49 posted on 07/04/2017 6:52:49 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (The fear of stark justice sends hot urine down their thighs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

More than vacationers, college students nationally are encouraged to register and to vote in elections local to campus. Its very likely many of them also vote absentee in their actual home state elections too.


50 posted on 07/04/2017 6:53:12 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

It was like 1980 on the Missouri side and yes, after I went back and voted again, they called me to tell me I was a b8tch


51 posted on 07/04/2017 6:54:46 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Pull all fed funding from states that refuse to comply sometimes ya gatta use thumb screws to get answers.


52 posted on 07/04/2017 6:55:11 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The word “wide spread” is a red herring. The voter fraud is not going to be found widespread. In fact, there was no widespread fraud. Sending out search parties for wide spread fraud is the key to hiding the real fraud.

To the contrary, the fraud is very concentrated. The fraud occurs in cities, in specific precincts and perhaps specific voting machines or booths within those precincts. The fact the fraud is concentrated makes detection difficult and perhaps impossible. The fraudulent precincts are heavily guarded with multiple layers of barbed wire, mines,sand bags and machine guns and several judges.

Perhaps a needle in a haystack is not a perfect analogy, but the concept is why the fraud is not only possible but effective


53 posted on 07/04/2017 6:55:36 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
41 states refuse to comply President Trump requested data

41 states with crooked fraudulent vote process?Who would have believed it? /S

54 posted on 07/04/2017 6:56:45 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Statement from Linda H. Lamone

Hmmmmmm...§3–506

What about §3–505
(c) (1) Consistent with regulations adopted by the State Board, local boards shall maintain for at least 2 years all records concerning programs to ensure the accuracy and currency of the statewide voter registration list.
(2) Except for records concerning a declination to register or the identity of a voter registration agency through which a particular voter applies for registration, the records described in paragraph (1) of this subsection are accessible under Title 4 of the General Provisions Article (Access to Public Records).

55 posted on 07/04/2017 6:57:39 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

You are right, the GOP is as twisted and rotten as the Rat party. It operatives are pi8sed that we didn’t want Jebbie or Mario or Teddy.


56 posted on 07/04/2017 6:57:46 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Funny how almost none of those states said a thing about the requirements of the Real ID act, which provides among other things that the federal government can access state drivers license databases -- which have name, address, date of birth, and usually social security numbers. Those are exactly the same data items that the liberal left is now screaming about as an invasion of privacy.

When it benefits the left divulging private data is fine, and forcing everyone to have an ID is fine. But when it comes to ending election fraud, they are suddenly united in opposition. That tells you a lot.

57 posted on 07/04/2017 7:04:50 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Secretary of State in each state has much control of voting thus records. As I posted in another thread — It appears that Soros “Secretary of State Project” to get liberals in those positions in all states worked at least 41 times! Affects even states with Republican governors.


58 posted on 07/04/2017 7:12:09 AM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

You are right.

However, this is just like the ineffective TSA screening, of course we could NEVER EVER point out the truth of the matter to the public .......


59 posted on 07/04/2017 7:16:04 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = USSR; Journ0List + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: nfldgirl; All

If three said they have not received a request, then how many of the 41 mentioned in this article have ALSO not received a request?

Smells like a hit piece on DJT.

I appreciate concern about federal interference in what is a state matter—the conduct of elections. Yet liberals DEMAND that the feds get involved when allegations of civil rights violations (the right to vote) are made. That is what the Voters Rights Act was all about—and every few years it was renewed, IIRC, because libs said southern states were still discriminatory. (Not really true, though, as the Democrat Party that ruled the south in the 60s was thankfully replaced by a more tolerant Republican majority.)

So now enter the 2000s. Places like Philadelphia inner city precincts apparently get more than 100% participation, reports surface of Minnesota finding votes just when it looks like Al Franken will lose, and California goes from a battleground state in the 80s to a certain Democrat state right after amnesty for illegals is granted.

What about the civil right for every AMERICAN to not have their vote canceled out by a fraudulent one? Isn’t there a national interest there?

I know it can be a slippery slope. I do NOT advocate nationalization of our elections. Yet something should be done to ensure integrity.

JMHO.


60 posted on 07/04/2017 7:21:21 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson