Posted on 06/26/2017 7:33:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
“typical of a mindset of a lot of the liberal, overpaid, arrogant, clueless professors who brainwash people that come into their classes.”
If this is true, good for the university. Finally some college administrators are making the right decisions to get rid of these hateful people.
Otto may have been foolish, ignorant and young, but he didn’t deserve to be murdered under any circumstances related to his “crime”. As for this so called professor, she’s indirectly showing he support for ruthless communism as performed by the North Koreans, and her own self hatred as a white privilege and her contempt for white males.
“College fires professor who said Otto Warmbier ‘deserved’ to die...”
So this ugly-a$$ carpet muncher hates Whites and wants to eliminate them, after taking all their money.
After reading link in my own post, I find “fired” not the correct word. “Dettwyler was not employed at the time of her statement, and her contract will not be renewed, the university said”
How tolerant of her. What goes around, comes around.
Hate to say, but the professor is right.
RE: Hate to say, but the professor is right.
I have to disagree with you here. NOBODY deserves what Otto got.
Just saw her picture on google. Now it makes sense why she would say such a stupid thing.
He traveled to North Korea thinking that it was something fun to do during a break from school and then a corrupt, murderous regime arrested him on likely false charges, ran him through a show trial, and then murdered him in a near perfect example of the story of the Fox and the Scorpion.
Sorry, but to me he’s a Darwin Award nominee.
We all cheered when Rachel Corrie was run over by that bull dozer. Cause she was a liberal pro-Hamas idiot.
But when Warmbier was doing his activism - many want to give him a pass because it was for Christian purposes in that evil North Korean regime.
Splitting fine hairs here.
“Splitting fine hairs here.”
Good afternoon.
I look at it this way with the following caveat...
Cory went to a hostile AO to assist terrorist (Hamas), to kill Israeli citizens (and others).
Wambier went to a hostile AO to evangelize and save peoples lives.
Caveat: One person’s freedom fighter is another person’s terrorist.
5.56mm
Well put.
If Otto did get “what he deserved”; then he got a warm welcome into Heaven
St. Pancake? Slipped her in under the gates of Hell?
Only God knows.
“St. Pancake? Slipped her in under the gates of Hell?”
LOL.
5.56mm
“Why I oughta ...”
LOL! Here's a picture of her from one of her books (notice the resemblance):
.
As someone else pointed out "which one's the dog?".
RE: We all cheered when Rachel Corrie was run over by that bull dozer. Cause she was a liberal pro-Hamas idiot.
But when Warmbier was doing his activism - many want to give him a pass because it was for Christian purposes in that evil North Korean regime.
__________________________
Hairs have to be split because they are splittable.
In the case of Rachel Corrie she was killed when she DELIBERATELY went into a combat zone during the height of the second Palestinian intifada. The IDF’s mission was to seize weapons and locate smuggling tunnels in a military zone between the Rafah refugee camp and the Egyptian border
There was NO DELIBERATE INTENT by the IDF to kill her. Corrie placed herself in the path of a Caterpillar D9R armored bulldozer in the area and was fatally injured.
In the case of Otto, THERE WAS INTENT TO HARM. And there was no good reason to give him a sentence of 15 years hard labor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.