Posted on 05/26/2017 4:16:46 AM PDT by dontreadthis
*
When in fact, Trump was riffing off of and ridiculing both Crooked's private wedding and parties server, and the "MUH Russia" news stories that were circulating at the same time.
Interesting.
Savage was playing audio with Trump from right before the election with Savage saying the dems/intel community are going to blame Hill’s loss on Russia. Told him to be careful. He said he knew and they were working on it or something.
When the DNC discovered that someone inside their group had leaked their emails to Wikileaks, they concocted the Russian meme to cover it up?......
This is very important information--good work by a centipede over at Reddit.
The DNC knew about the coming Wikileaks drop and invented this cover to deal with it.
As well as eliminating Seth Rich.
Pull on the string marked Seth Rich, and the whole DNC/Obama Administration comes undone.
Summary: (let me see if I’ve got this right)
1. IC alerts DNC that they’ve been hacked
2. DNC, via Warren Flood and his Guccifer 2.0 creation, alters the metadata of hacked documents to appear as is they’ve passed through Russian hands.
3. DNC hires Crowdstrike to examine hacked documents to confirm Russian intervention.
4. Seth Rich is murdered
5. Wikileaks releases original? hacked documents
If this summary is what the author is saying, then the Wikileaks documents will have different metadata than those released by Guccifer.
Bingo!
per Reddit:
“cross-reference to Wikileaks shows that Warren Flood did not author any of the documents”
“Warren Flood is a high-ranking technology official for Democratic operatives, having worked for Obama for America, DNC, and Joe Biden. It’s a unique name.
His name does not appear in any of the Wikileaks emails, meaning that he appears to be a third party as far as the DNC email leaks are concerned.”
is this “bingo”?
Yes.
First, Guccifer 1.0 (Hillary’s server hacked by him) is a real Romanian hacker.
Guccifer 2.0 is a fake Romanian hacker of the DNC server.
Warren Flood set up the leaked documents to point to the fake Guccifer (2.0), who turned out to not even know Romanian as a language.
Thus, the metadata of the Seth Rich-leaked DNC documents(the real thing) will NOT match those that Flood concocted for the Guccifer 2.0 release, masked as a Russian operation.
I’m thinking pseudonyms:
(Elizabeth) Warren = deep hole
Maxine Waters = Flood
LOL!!
The fact the FBI allowed Crowdstrike to examine the DNC servers is a giant red flag. Since when does the FBI allow 3rd parties to do forensic examination of a server when that 3rd party was hired by the DNC?
FBI: "We need to examine your servers as part of a criminal investigation".
Joe Nobody: "I've got my own IT guy. He'll take a look."
FBI: "Oh, OK. No problem."
It’s right in Guccifer 2.0’s blog. Pertinent quote: “The main part of the papers, thousands of files and mails, I gave to Wikileaks. They will publish them soon.” The DNC knew they were having their documents leaked to Wikileaks, and wanted to make sure a Russian hacker took credit for the leaks.
from Reddit comments:
In before the people who say “Guccifer is such a lazy stupid name. They would never use that!”
It’s exactly why they would use that. It’s a very clever name to use for disinformation.
It floods any search for Guccifer with results for Guccifer 2.0 and muddies the waters.
A testament to the intentional confusion is how many of us confuse Guccifer with Guccifer 2.0 or even use Guccifer as shorthand. I’m sure it will be seen in this very thread.
Since Guccifer is a real known hacker, the Guccifer 2.0 name piggybacks on that legitimacy.
Edit: Many of us have bought into Guccifer 2.0 because he claims that Seth leaked to WikiLeaks.
But it is bait used to push the main idea that Guccifer 2.0 wants us to promote: that “Russia hacked the election > Trump colluded with Russia > Trump should be outed.”
I don't think the FBI had any control or choice in that. The DNC refused to give the FBI access, and the FBI chose to not undertake a criminal investigation that would have empowered it to seize the evidence.
-- FBI: "We need to examine your servers as part of a criminal investigation". --
That part didn't happen. I don't think that the DNC even contacted the FBI with a claim that they had been hacked. I think the FBI remarks on the subject followed news reports, not contact from "the victim."
The point is that they were not “hacked”. The emails were released by a whistle blower - Seth Rich - and that is what the DNC is trying to obfuscate by blaming it on “Russia”. As the article said, Seth Rich was the only one who could step forward at any time and reveal the lie. Strangely, he was never given the opportunity. Wikileaks never reveals its sources but they did say, several times, that the source was NOT Russia but internal.
Motive, Means, Opportunity are all present.
Who ordered the hit is now more important then who pulled the trigger.
BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.