Posted on 05/25/2017 6:11:55 AM PDT by ColdOne
Former FBI Director James Comey’s controversial decision to detail the FBI’s findings in the Hillary Clinton email case without Justice Department input was influenced by a dubious Russian document that the FBI now considers to be bad intelligence, The Washington Post reported Wednesday.
The secret document, which purported to be a piece of Russian intelligence, claimed that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch had privately assured someone in the Clinton campaign that the investigation into Clinton’s handling of classified information would go nowhere.
But according to people familiar with the matter, by August the FBI had come to believe the document was unreliable — and in fact may have been planted as a fake to confuse the FBI.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Pardon my ignorance, but who or what is DWS?
DWS=Debbie Wasserman Schulz
The document, obtained by the FBI, was a piece of purported analysis by Russian intelligence, the people said. It referred to an email supposedly written by the then-chair of the Democratic National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), and sent to Leonard Benardo, an official with the Open Society Foundations, an organization founded by billionaire George Soros and dedicated to promoting democracy.
The Russian document did not contain a copy of the email, but it described some of the contents of the purported message.
It was a real communication from DWS to the Soros guy, reassuring the Soros guy that Lynch was taking care of the email investigation so that it would not lead to an indictment.
Now if they can pin all Podesta’s/Palmieris wetwork with Seth Rich on her, then that’s a mighty good BINGO.
It shouldn’t matter if they can or cannot prove the Rich murder. The Justice Department just needs to prove two things:
1) Seth Rich leaked the documents to Wikileaks
2) Russia was not the source of the leaked emails, therefore was not colluding with Trump
3) Obama, Lynch, Comey, Clinton, DWS and others colluded with each other to create the Russian/Trump collusion narrative in order to wage a coup against an elected President.
Those three things should be easy to prove, and would be enough to put them all in jail.
Sorry, meant 3 things
You know, you should post the above in its own thread. It really is breaking news.
This is Billary, Inc. using the deep state Comey (their good friend) brought into the FBI and that deep state’s co-Clintonistas in the media to manufacture after-the-fact “facts” to cover how Comey was always operating on an agenda for Billary, Inc.
Check this out, this DWS email to Soros about Lynch clearing HRC.
Explains a lot if true.
Thanks.
So, where’s the email? Wonder if DOJ has a copy?
Maybe it’s on that laptop the DCPD won’t fork back over to DWS, forcing her to threaten their budget.
Comey had, has, the facts needed to indict Hilary and he failed to do so. Intel had nothing to do with his failure. There are laws that charge LE for intentionally failing to do their sworn duty. Maybe Comey has violated one of them. If so, go after him.
Curiouser and curiouser.
Someone has it, most likely Russian intelligence, which I am sure is what triggered the document that the Washington Post now claims was forged.
DWS was absolutely frantic yesterday about trying to get her laptop back. They DC capitol police have her laptop while they investigate her IT people. The smoking gun email (or ways to find it) are on that laptop. But the Justice Dept needs to see the laptop, and examine it beyond what the DC Capitol police are looking at.
“..the sources were Russian ...”
I understood the report was complete fabrication - a product of someone’s imagination.
“...One wonders why not?...”
I understand the FBI wanted to investigate the alleged Russian hack and related matters but DNC refused.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.