Skip to comments.
New Cracks in Russia-gate ‘Assessment’
Consortium News ^
| 23
| Robert Parry
Posted on 05/24/2017 3:58:16 PM PDT by Lorianne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
05/24/2017 3:58:16 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: Lorianne
did any of the moronic GOP on the committee (Gowdy excluded) challenge Brennan about this???
2
posted on
05/24/2017 4:00:56 PM PDT
by
God luvs America
(63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: God luvs America
When Brennan testified about the quantity of intelligence about contacts between the Trump Campaign and Russian interests, the first question should have been, “Just how did you come about knowing that the Americans in question were part of the Trump Campaign?”
3
posted on
05/24/2017 4:14:30 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: dirtboy
They buy caviar? Grey goose?
4
posted on
05/24/2017 4:15:59 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! And please, God, bless the USA again.)
To: Lorianne
5
posted on
05/24/2017 4:16:30 PM PDT
by
thinden
To: Lorianne
Wow, why would they fail to include the Coast Guard Intelligence?
Here are the 17 intel agencies:
To: Lorianne
It only involved the FBI, NSA and CIA as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence...
How can this be true ?
John Brennan(CIA) claimed evidence.
Clapper(DNI) claimed no evidence.
7
posted on
05/24/2017 4:20:05 PM PDT
by
stylin19a
(Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
To: Lorianne
That whole “17 intelligence agencies” thing was a lie from the get go.
Larry Johnson was right. There was no written report from these “17 agencies”. They did not all conclude the same thing. Another of the many lies of H. Clinton and her sycophant media.
We are being lied to over and over and over again by our government and their lapdog media. It never ends.
There is no point to an ‘investigation’ because they are all corrupt and in on the lying game.
8
posted on
05/24/2017 4:23:02 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: Lorianne
When Hillary’s sever was hacked, they did not permit the FBI to investigate the crime.
Why? Cause Hillary knew it must have been an inside job.
Why did Hillary call in Crowdstrike to inspect the server?
To map the path back to the leaker and identify all of Seth Rich’s associates
To: Lorianne
How many in a high state of outrage used the "17 U.S. intelligence agencies all agreed" argument to justify their argument that no one could possibly question the report? Have anyone conceded they may have been mislead? It would appear that the headline should have been: "A small group selected by the political leadership from 24 percent of the U.S. intelligence agencies issued a critical report subsequently leaked to selected media outlets."
10
posted on
05/24/2017 4:36:41 PM PDT
by
etcb
To: Lorianne
I believe we used to call this “ cherry picking”
11
posted on
05/24/2017 4:37:16 PM PDT
by
silverleaf
(We voted for change, not leftover change)
To: Lorianne
It was sold as the assessment of the “intelligence community” - which we all knew was a lie. Nice of Brennan to admit it.
12
posted on
05/24/2017 4:50:48 PM PDT
by
Ray76
(DRAIN THE SWAMP)
To: Lorianne
It wasnt a full inter-agency community assessment that was coordinated among the 17 agencies, and for good reason because of the nature and the sensitivity of the information trying, once again, to keep that tightly compartmented. Ha ...blows a hole in Obambi legacy
as he mandated release of Trump and associates wire taps to all 17 agencies and some overseas.
13
posted on
05/24/2017 4:51:20 PM PDT
by
spokeshave
(In the Thatch Weave,..Trump's Wing Man is Truth)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
...Wow, why would they fail to include the Coast Guard Intelligence...
Coast Guard appears to be there, but where’s the Merchant Marine?
14
posted on
05/24/2017 4:51:55 PM PDT
by
Sasparilla
( I'm Not tired of Winning)
To: Lorianne
From the same folks who told you Benghazi was outrage over a video.
They have the same credibility as "Baghdad Bob."
None.
15
posted on
05/24/2017 4:52:00 PM PDT
by
Gargantua
("Still not tired of winning---beeyotch!" ;^)
To: Lorianne
> if she won as expected and learned of the operation she might have sought revenge against him and his country.
Nonsense. Putin and Clinton do business together.
16
posted on
05/24/2017 4:52:06 PM PDT
by
Ray76
(DRAIN THE SWAMP)
To: dirtboy
17
posted on
05/24/2017 4:52:49 PM PDT
by
Ray76
(DRAIN THE SWAMP)
To: Lorianne
When the dust settles, I want to see the BIG ZERO in front of a jury in an orange jumpsuit, along with many of his aids and intelligence agency heads.
18
posted on
05/24/2017 4:53:56 PM PDT
by
Robert357
( Dan Rather was discharged as "medically unfit" on May 11, 1954.)
To: Lorianne
I listed to Brennan’s testimony and the one question I wish had been asked was, if everyone, from Intel to MSM to Russia believed that Hillary was going to win, why would Brennen be concerned in the least about any contacts?
19
posted on
05/24/2017 5:05:11 PM PDT
by
blueplum
("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
To: Lorianne
Robert Parry. A great reporter on Iran Contra.
20
posted on
05/24/2017 5:11:14 PM PDT
by
Theoria
(I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson