To: Blood of Tyrants
I can’t imagine anyone but a gay man wearing one 
There was a time, however.....
16 posted on
05/21/2017 6:15:45 PM PDT by
Mase
(Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
To: Mase
Well. It didn’t look good then, either.
21 posted on
05/21/2017 6:27:53 PM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Mase
to be fair, that was poolside wear not for out and about
24 posted on
05/21/2017 6:34:19 PM PDT by
Chode
(My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United States of America-#45 DJT)
To: Mase
26 posted on
05/21/2017 6:35:46 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
To: Mase
IF you’re Sean Connery, you can wear whatever you want.
27 posted on
05/21/2017 6:35:51 PM PDT by
Shadow44
To: Mase
Obviously, 007 was undercover.
35 posted on
05/21/2017 7:00:11 PM PDT by
meyer
(The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
To: Mase
I’m sure the hand you can’t see is holding a PPK.
46 posted on
05/21/2017 7:25:29 PM PDT by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll eventually get what you deserve)
To: Mase
The Beretta 418. Nice and light in a lady's romper. No stopping power.
51 posted on
05/21/2017 7:34:35 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity - Pres. Eisenhower)
To: Mase
That was not a good look for 007, although his wildly elevated testosterone level overcame the gayness of it.
To: Mase
Oh man, that’s what I get for rushing to hit the post button! You already posted the exact same picture of bond in a romper. Sean Connery, what were you thinking!?
To: Mase
That Bond outfit was either jammies or swimsuit cover-up, I forget which.
112 posted on
05/22/2017 12:55:01 PM PDT by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson