Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
Trump needs to appeal it all the way up to SCOTUS

You're asking the President to slog his way through a process which has been completely corrupted by the same out of control, treasonous branch of government, that is defying his plenary authority to do his job.

That strategy is illogical on its face.

The President needs to address the nation, citing chapter and verse of the Law and the Constitution, showing point by point where the Judicial branch has overstepped its constitutional authority.

He then needs to let the people know that he intends to ignore the court's illegal orders, and that he's officially demanding that Congress use its power to put a stop to this judicial tyranny. He has to face the fact that he will effectively have his presidency nullified and arrested in place, if he does not stand firm on his authority.

215 posted on 04/25/2017 3:41:35 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

“The President needs to address the nation, citing chapter and verse of the Law and the Constitution, showing point by point where the Judicial branch has overstepped its constitutional authority.”

The people of the United States don’t care. They are ruled by the Establishment and happy with it. Trump is boxed and WILL be impeached and convicted if he budges. They are signaling they have him and he will play their game.

The people won’t help him. They are meaningless peasants. And they won’t revolt. This nation had gone totalitarian long before Trump came around.


230 posted on 04/25/2017 4:20:47 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

Actually if you read the court orders, this particular case seems to be making a mountain out of a mole hill.

The government admitted that it applied to only a few funds that had very specific conditions in the legislation. The injunction basically said that it was conforming to the governments own interpretation of the order and only blocking the unconstitutional funds that the government had already said it didn’t apply to.


295 posted on 04/25/2017 8:12:16 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson