Skip to comments.
Florida High School Students Forced to Remove Cross Jewelry and Participate in LGBT Activities
The Stream ^
| 04/21/2017
| Nancy Flory
Posted on 04/21/2017 9:26:18 AM PDT by ForYourChildren
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-168 next last
To: ifinnegan
121
posted on
04/21/2017 3:09:16 PM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale
Profanity and the finger.
Sounds bi-lingual to me. That’s exemplary.
“What we got here is failure to communicate.”
122
posted on
04/21/2017 4:04:08 PM PDT
by
Scrambler Bob
(Brought to you from Turtle Island, otherwise known as 'So-Called North America')
To: polymuser
> I take it you’re specifically referring to the separation of church and state clause? <
Not really. I’m basing my arguments on the Equal Protection clause. For if you allow a crucifix in a public school, you cannot prohibit the hijab. It’s both, or neither.
There is nothing wrong with wearing a crucifix. In fact, it’s a very positive thing! It’s the hijab and other Islamic symbols that worry me.
123
posted on
04/21/2017 4:06:29 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: polymuser
And permit me to add one more thing to my post #123.
What about prayer? If a public school allows, say, a Christian coach to say a Christian prayer before a game, mustn’t that school also a Muslim coach to say a Muslim prayer before a game?
And I don’t know about you, but no way would I want a kid of mine subjected to a Muslim prayer.
So again I must regretfully reach that same conclusion. Allow both, or allow neither.
124
posted on
04/21/2017 4:40:28 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: ForYourChildren
I believe that is in Hillsborough County. I am also under the impression that there are a number of FReepers in Hillsborough County. Their comments and assessments should be both interesting and informative.
125
posted on
04/21/2017 4:45:46 PM PDT
by
sport
To: WKUHilltopper
Along with the Principal and everyone involved in her hiring.
126
posted on
04/21/2017 4:52:45 PM PDT
by
sport
To: ifinnegan
So you endorse worse?
Go figure.
127
posted on
04/21/2017 4:58:33 PM PDT
by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Acad emi are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
To: NFHale
128
posted on
04/21/2017 5:10:26 PM PDT
by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Acad emi are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
To: Leaning Right
In 2008 I purchased a new 2007 Chevrolet pickup. After obama stole General Motors, I received a certificate for a free oil change in the mail from the dealership.I took it to the dealership's service department, presented the certificate to the service writer and said, “I received this in the mail and would like an oil change”. They said fine, and an attendant drove it to the lubrication department. While I was waiting, another service advisor asked me, " How do you like your new truck?" I replied, "I liked it pretty good until obama stole General Motors, now I fell like I am driving stolen property." He was not happy. Does that qualify as a Chevy trucks are garbage in a Chevy dealership comment? “
129
posted on
04/21/2017 5:16:36 PM PDT
by
sport
To: ForYourChildren
SUE THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....................
130
posted on
04/21/2017 5:43:22 PM PDT
by
Bellflower
(Who dares believe Jesus?)
To: Leaning Right
But Im a strict interpreter of the Constitution. So I must reluctantly say that such a prayer would be unconstitutional. Really?
You are apparently a "strict interpreter of the Constitution" who never actually read the Constitution otherwise you would know that it says the exact opposite of what you are saying.
Here is the actual first amendment in it's entirety.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
You see the part in bold print? That is EXACTLY what you are doing.
131
posted on
04/21/2017 5:57:33 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
To: RitaOK
“So you endorse worse?”
You’re trolling, but I’ll bite.
What am I endorsing worse? You’re comment makes no sense.
132
posted on
04/21/2017 5:58:40 PM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: Leaning Right
But its better to just keep religion - and politics, for that matter - out of public institutions. Both are illegal under the actual Constitution of the United States.
Perhaps you are confused and are actually a strict interpreter of the USSR Constitution.
That is where you will find such.
133
posted on
04/21/2017 6:00:30 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
To: Lionheartusa1
Re: Dealing with the indoctrination
What do you suggest?
134
posted on
04/21/2017 6:18:18 PM PDT
by
wintertime
(Stop treating government teachers like they are reincarnated Mother Teresas!)
To: ForYourChildren
Safe schools except if your Christian.
135
posted on
04/21/2017 6:21:56 PM PDT
by
wintertime
(Stop treating government teachers like they are reincarnated Mother Teresas!)
To: ForYourChildren
She’s obviously a Satanist.
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Kindly see my posts #123 and 124. I’m more concerned about the Equal Protection clause.
But yes, I suppose the 1A might apply here also. Congress cannot prohibit the free exercise of religion. But that does not mean there can be no restrictions whatsoever on religion.
And we’re not talking about a private home here. We are talking about a public school. Reasonable restrictions apply. I guess the sticking point here is what constitutes a reasonable restriction.
137
posted on
04/21/2017 6:28:49 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: BookmanTheJanitor
Until I read your post, I didn’t realize the irony of her actions.
To: Leaning Right
To: polymuser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-168 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson