Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US intelligence intercepted communications between Syrian military and chemical experts
CNN ^

Posted on 04/12/2017 8:45:17 PM PDT by USA-FRANCE

The US military and intelligence community has intercepted communications featuring Syrian military and chemical experts talking about preparations for the sarin attack in Idlib last week, a senior US official tells CNN.

(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Syria
KEYWORDS: 201704; bcw; chemical; communications; experts; idlib; intelligence; intercepted; military; sarin; saringas; syria; syrian; syrianwar; syrianwmd; trump; trumpsyria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

1 posted on 04/12/2017 8:45:17 PM PDT by USA-FRANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

...And incidentally captured traffic with Trump coordinating the next election fraud with Russia...


2 posted on 04/12/2017 8:46:38 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (Jerusalem is the city of The Great King! Forgive my misspelling when on my tablet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Were they unmasked ?


3 posted on 04/12/2017 8:46:47 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

The BS comes thick and fast from the MSM


4 posted on 04/12/2017 8:48:27 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

It’s CNN, so we at least know that our people did NOT intercept this type of communication.


5 posted on 04/12/2017 8:50:33 PM PDT by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Syria is old news. The intervention there is done. Assad can get on with the killing now.


6 posted on 04/12/2017 8:50:48 PM PDT by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

If this is to be believed, then the US had advanced warning that a poison gas was imminent. Did the US express to the Russians or somehow to the Syrians that such an attack would not be acceptable? If they did, those deaths may have been prevented without the US assuming a deeper, costly involvement in this quagmire.


7 posted on 04/12/2017 8:51:04 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

If they got this electronic intercepts and they tracked the SU-22s to the target and back like I’ve read, and they have photographic evidence of Sarin chemical weapons from satellites, it’s open and shut.

Pootie Putin is talking out his butt.


8 posted on 04/12/2017 8:51:05 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Could be, whom do we trust? Pravda RT?


9 posted on 04/12/2017 8:51:38 PM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Like you said it is CNN. So we need more sources.


10 posted on 04/12/2017 8:52:22 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Lot of BS down on the farm..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otK38i8QKJo


11 posted on 04/12/2017 8:52:49 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE
...a senior US official tells CNN.

Probably McCain or his girlfriend again.

12 posted on 04/12/2017 8:53:23 PM PDT by McGruff (You break it, you bought it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Maybe.
I still think the Russians at the base saw what was going on and ratted them out. Russia doesn’t need chem weapons screwing up their plans in Syria.


13 posted on 04/12/2017 8:53:54 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

They know who was flying each SU-22, and it was not some General, They know who the aircrew is


14 posted on 04/12/2017 8:55:26 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Journalism is a career for the feeble minded?


15 posted on 04/12/2017 8:56:03 PM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

the article states that the intercepts were discovered after the fact as a part of deciphering traffic for that day


16 posted on 04/12/2017 8:57:46 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Pootie Putin is talking out his butt.

WHAT????

How dare anybody impugn the veracity of a former KGB Minister of Propaganda or even consider he could possibly consider any false explanation of events. It's Inconceivable!!! /s

17 posted on 04/12/2017 8:57:56 PM PDT by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Please read carefuly the article. It explains clearly why the Intelligence got the info after the gas attack rather than before the attack. Sound logic to me.


18 posted on 04/12/2017 8:58:28 PM PDT by USA-FRANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Russia’s as guilty as sin. Maybe not April 4, but certainly in 2016. Our message to Assad put quite a few people on notice.

June 22, 2016
Oopsie!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/22/russia-caught-out-using-incediary-weapons-in-report-by-own-chann/


19 posted on 04/12/2017 9:00:42 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE
From the CNN article:

US officials have said that there is "no doubt" that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is responsible for the attack.

The "no doubt" part refers to an article that is just as non-explaining as the posted article.

The US did not know prior to the attack it was going to happen, the official emphasized. The US scoops up such a large volume of communications intercepts in areas like Syria and Iraq, the material often is not processed unless there is a particular event that requires analysts to go back and look for supporting intelligence material.

Yeah, that sounds pretty definitive.

So far there are no intelligence intercepts that have been found directly confirming that Russian military or intelligence officials communicated about the attack. The official said the likelihood is the Russians are more careful in their communications to avoid being intercepted.

This is the kind of thing that passes for concrete intel?

They must think we are real idiots.

20 posted on 04/12/2017 9:00:57 PM PDT by Slyfox (Where's Reagan when we need him? Look in the mirror - the spirit of The Gipper lives within you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson