Skip to comments.
Pentagon: Russia May Have Directly Participated in Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack
Breitbart ^
| 04/07/2017
| John Hayward
Posted on 04/08/2017 9:22:08 AM PDT by Rusty0604
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-104 next last
To: Rusty0604
They do, but nukes are way too strategically important for nations to want to give up entirely, although as you say I’m sure there are plenty of Dims who would be first in line to hand them over.
It’s a similar thing with landmines and clusterbombs - the amount of harm they can cause long after peace is declared is why a lot of nations banned their use.
81
posted on
04/08/2017 11:23:19 AM PDT
by
The Numbers
(God, Family and Country is Right.)
To: Trump20162020
To: Nifster
They russkies have a different agenda than you do.
They filled an auditorium with lethal gas to get a few terrorists.....school children in the auditorium died too
Not quite a complete and truthful presentation of the facts there Nifster. You and I both know the intent of using that gas on the terrorists (and by necessity the children) in that auditorium was to knock them out and/or degrade their mental facilities as the rescuers rushed in to SAVE the children. They did NOT sacrifice the children to GET the terrorists. They did the only thing they could to save as many children as they could in a bad situation not of their making.
Why no mention of the number of children saved? You know, the children that the Islamic terrorists and not the Russians were hell bent on killing? Is it because that question confuses your narrative of Ruskies = bad bad people?
83
posted on
04/08/2017 11:29:16 AM PDT
by
Garth Tater
(End the Fed. Return to sound money and Constitutional governance.)
To: MNDude
Totally preposterous. Who makes this garbage up? I do know we have imbeciles in this country and around the world who believe this crap. We need to GTFO of Syria at any rate. How about we GTFO of the Mideast and concentrate on the Pacific Rim. The Norks are the biggest threat and China is acting reasonabley civil for the time being. Let Saudi Arabia and Iran sort it out. It’s not worth one American life or American dime let alone our reputation. The suck of the Mideast destroys administrations. WTH are we piggybacking on the Obama regimes mess and lies and following the chickenhawk Clinton/McCain/Graham idiocy? The lack of truth, intelligence and common sense is what gets people killed. It is time to reset how America works its foreign policy and intelligence agencies. The media and unnamed sources within and outside of this administration as far as I am concerned can just go to hell.
84
posted on
04/08/2017 11:32:08 AM PDT
by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
To: Garth Tater
Of course it saved some children. I’m good with that. But suggesting the russkies are pure is silly
They were willing to kill there own to accomplish a mission. I don’t consider that a bad thing depending on circumstances.
The catch with that gas was it had not been well tested and they knew death was possible out come.
85
posted on
04/08/2017 11:39:27 AM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Lurkinanloomin
No more wars unless all the politicians are in the first assault wave, in point position.
McSwine can snarl at them, Linda can hit them with his/her purse, The Rubbe can sling sweat at them, and Hitlery can screech at them.
86
posted on
04/08/2017 11:42:31 AM PDT
by
5th MEB
(Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
To: Nifster
That was a much more objective presentation of the situation the Russians were faced with Nifster. Not at all like your previous post.
87
posted on
04/08/2017 11:48:03 AM PDT
by
Garth Tater
(End the Fed. Return to sound money and Constitutional governance.)
To: rusureitflies?
Clarifying? Do you trust Trump or do you not trust Trump?It wasn't a comment about trusting Trump.
Do you trust unnamed sources or do you not trust unnamed sources??
To: Rusty0604
No one has mentioned, that just last week, ISIS attacked Mother Russia. It is safe to assume, that a clear message was sent to ISIS, about what terror really is. If ISIS attacks Russia again, I would not be surprised if WMD shows up on the battlefield again.
89
posted on
04/08/2017 12:11:36 PM PDT
by
mission9
(It is by the fruit ye shall know.)
To: Rusty0604
The globalists, leftists, and neo-cons want their war with Russia. They see the bombing of the Syrian base as a good step in that direction. Look for the media to keep pushing “the Russians were actually behind it” meme. They want to keep the pressure up.
90
posted on
04/08/2017 12:24:49 PM PDT
by
JGT
To: JGT
The media wants Russia to bring back Communism.
91
posted on
04/08/2017 12:25:52 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Nifster
Death was a certain outcome if they didn’t.
To: dfwgator
I think they also want millions of more “refugees” to pour into Europe and America while Saudi Arabia puts in some whabbist lunatic to take the place of Assad.
93
posted on
04/08/2017 12:38:12 PM PDT
by
JGT
To: Rusty0604
Oh, yeah—let’s bomb a hospital to cover up the evidence against us!
Jeesh!
Mattis obviously is in on this attitude as well. It is insane that they cuddle up with the worst of the Saudis, who like us, have fostered and advanced the worst of the jihadists, but somehow we can’t have civility with a Russia that clearly doesn’t want to go to war with us.
To: 9YearLurker
It doesn’t make any sense, does it?
To: 9YearLurker
Have they started to pull dead babies out of the bombed Syria site yet?
96
posted on
04/08/2017 2:04:18 PM PDT
by
Daffynition
("The New PTSD: Post-Trump Stress Disorder" - The MLN didn't make Trump, so they can't break Trump.)
To: Daffynition
Dead babies was all it took to get Ivanka to get her father to shoot off the missiles.
So I guess they know what to serve up the next time someone wants to serve our military up against someone else.
To: 9YearLurker
You may be correct, but that wasn't implied in my post. :)
98
posted on
04/08/2017 2:15:18 PM PDT
by
Daffynition
("The New PTSD: Post-Trump Stress Disorder" - The MLN didn't make Trump, so they can't break Trump.)
To: Daffynition
To: Nifster
It appears to be a hopeless situation trying to set some people here straight on the evil nature of the Russian government. Many otherwise good folks seem to have no clue of the diabolical history of the KGB and FSB. And it's not only Putin who's former KGB and/or FSB, but many people around him.
Just last year a court found that the FSB was responsible for the poisoning death of a former KGB agent who had earlier spilled the beans on Putin and the Russian gov for staging terror attacks in their country. And no way in hell would the FSB have carried out the “hit” without Putin's knowledge and approval.
100
posted on
04/08/2017 9:29:23 PM PDT
by
ETL
(Obama-Hillary, the REAL Russia-US scandal: details at my FR home page)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson