Posted on 04/07/2017 8:23:03 AM PDT by VitacoreVision
Hillary Clinton, the former secretary of state, gave a wide-ranging interview in New York Thursday where she called on the U.S. to carry out airstrikes on Syrian airfields in order to prevent more chemical attacks on its citizens.
"I really believe we should have and still should take out his air fields and prevent him from being able to use them to bomb innocent people and drop sarin gas on them,” Clinton made the comment during an interview with New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof at a women's summit.
Clinton said that she favored a more aggressive action against Assad, adding that not taking a tough stance on the Syrian president was one of her worst policy mistakes during her time as secretary of state under President Obama.
Her comments came in her first interview since losing the presidential election to Trump and hours before the U.S. launched a barrage of cruise missiles targeting a Syrian airfield in response to the deadly gas attack.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
lol!!!!
There she goes again. President Hillary, live from her fantasy Oval Office in Chappaqua.
She got question and answer ahead of time again.
So, what probably happened is this: someone in the deep state leaked it to Hillary and she then publicly made the statement to make herself look better to maybe make her self look presidential. I don’t believe in coincidence when it comes to these people. That means there are still Obama-Hillary moles in the inner circle.
That’s what happens when you don’t lock her up.
Or drain the swamp.
“....attendees at his rally chanted “lock her up.”
After the chants started at the President-elect’s post-election “thank you” rally in Michigan, he responded, “That plays great before the election — now we don’t care, right?”
Cernovich reported on this way before Hillary ever said anything.
And yet the dems will find a way to criticize Trump for this.
O my goodness.. so it’s a trump, hillary hybrid.. do we call it Trillary, or Hump?
Ah yes, the never Trumpers are out in force again
What happened was that Trump warned congressional leaders hours before the airstrike, who then told Hillary, who then wasted no time jumping in front of the cameras to leak classified intel.
Doesn’t every president shoot Tomahawks when they are trying to distract from something else going on? I can’t put my finger on it... something else going on.... hmmm...
“That means there are still Obama-Hillary moles in the inner circle.”
Without a doubt. If Trump had the appropriate amount of support, he would have done twice as much as he has already.
First off, what we’re being told is by the media who hates him. And us, apparently.
Secondly, the people in the white house for the past 8+ years have been visibly active in destroying the country and turning the US over to the UN. This isn’t undone in a month.
I’m really having an issue here with Trump making a Bush move though. Yes, he has the support of his security council but I think this isn’t going to turn out well for us in the short term.
If we can show dead ISIS players, or show that NK and China are backing off then it’s a win. But we have to see more for this effort.
The only thing this bitch wanted is for the evidence of her damn interference in the mid east to be destroyed. Missiles, WMDs and all that other nasty crap she didn’t give two sh!ts about when she approved them.
Or she was calling the shots behind the scenes. Who does she want us to strike next?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.