Susan Rice Ordered Spy Agencies To Produce ‘Detailed Spreadsheets’ Involving Trump

The Daily Caller ^ | March 3, 2017 | By Richard Pollock

[Brad from Tennessee]

Former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce “detailed spreadsheets” of legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running for president, according to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova.

“What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.

“The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”

Other knowledgeable official sources with direct knowledge and who requested anonymity confirmed to TheDCNF diGenova’s description of surveillance reports Rice ordered one year before the 2016 presidential election. . .

[unread]

"She’ll skate! The swamp and the mediapukes will see to it..while the eunuch pubs crawl back to their holes!"

I'm totally convinced that the republicans are a big part of the criminality of our government...
Their afraid to hold the dumocraps responsible for their crimes lest they themselves be held accountable...

Politics is all about blackmail.... The more you get on the other guy, the stronger you become... Just ask the worthless, stinking, lousy John McPain, he'll tell you.!!

There are two things we, as a county really need... WE NEED A NEW PARTY..!! And we need to rescind the 17th. amendment....

MHO.... :(

[nathanbedford]

Yes, the ones that had Hillary winning the popular vote.

It is not just a question of believing polls when the disparities are so gross it is a question of believing polls when the margin is narrow. Those who believe narrow polls include Kelly Ann Conway and even Trump's son-in-law who made critical decisions about campaigning in places like Michigan and elsewhere based on very narrow polls.

Those congressmen and senators whom Trump must cajole or intimidate into voting his way also believe in polls and they will want to know whether they must follow Trump or whether they can defy Trump and even run against Trump in their districts.

Polls might not matter to you, but they matter to the Trump campaign, and they matter to national politicians. If Trump has no heft in the polls, he has less power on Capitol Hill. If Trump does not have heft in the polls, you do not get the policies you like.

Yes I believe in polls, not as gospel but as indicators of trend and movement of sentiment -even when I do not like them. Don't you?

[faucetman]

“Trump’s amen chorus”

Not sure what that is, but I am sure I would be perceived to be in it, by most.

I have admired Donald Trump way back when I read The Art of the Deal in 1987.

It’s not cultish, it’s fact driven opinions. Do I say “Amen” to “most” (not all) things Trump says/believes? YES I DO!

Because I AGREE with him or better yet, he agrees with ME.

Was insinuating that I was a member of Trump’s “amen chorus” an adhominen attack? It was written in a way to provide you with plausible deniability while getting in your little dig.

Frankly, nathanbedford, I don’t give a damn. Have your fun, no insult received, no offense taken.

You don’t understand Trump, that’s not in dispute. Stick around eight years and maybe by then you will.

[formerlytempaussie]

As always, look at the small print.

[Red Badger]

[Red Badger]

If Bloomberg is running this story, IT HAS LEGS!.......................

[smileyface]

Yes, the MSM has been sitting on this bombshell...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/cernovich-explains-how-he-learned-about-susan-rice

[treetopsandroofs]

“At some point, some one must turn on him, tired of taking the arrows.”

The faithful leftist freaks worship the ground the Fraud walks on and would do anything for their god.

[Verginius Rufus]

Laura Ingraham was on "Fox & Friends" this morning and looked through a copy of the Washington Compost (as she called it). She could not find anything about Susan Rice in the paper.

[treetopsandroofs]

YAWN

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Trump vindicated, the thing is what is he going to do about it?

[wardamneagle]

Why Excel spreadsheets......for who, for what ?
Data manipulation.

[Jay Thomas]

Your discussing of polls are meaningless; Trump won and no matter what the polls say, he will remain president for at least 3 years and 10 months.

He’s two months in and he polls higher than the MSM and Congress. He’s being barraged 24/7/365 since he started running. Smaller men would have collapsed long ago. The problem you have is Trump couldn’t care less what the media or elites say about him.

Polls are shit and don’t change a thing. The worst thing Trump could do is start paying attention to polls like these. Economic confidence is at an all time high yet most people disapprove of Trump.

[COUNTrecount]

Yes I believe in polls, not as gospel but as indicators of trend and movement of sentiment -even when I do not like them. Don't you?

I don't unless the methodology is above board and consistent.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/?s=polls

[mommab2003]

The polls gave him a 2% chance of winning at 7 p.m. the night of the election. He won. Now these same polls say, 43% or 30% and they are the word of God.

I’m not a big fan of his calling out the Freedom caucus but nobody elected Ted Cruz. He’s President and just getting started.

[onona]

a bigger worry for Rice is her soon to be serious heart condition.

[nathanbedford]

For the record, my Amen chorus was not in any way intended to apply to you personally.

That said, I find it a little bit rich for you to accuse me of some sort of passive aggressive behavior to which you take umbrage after you posted this reply:

I’m sure sargon can stick up for themselves, but as I also (criticized your post (later on) Let me jump in here to say... thin skinned are we?

If you can’t take criticism, you ARE in the wrong place.

Should we call a “wambulance”?

[Fantasywriter]

‘It was Trump himself who said he could commit murder on Fifth Avenue and still be popular, or words to that effect.’

No it wasn’t. Trump didn’t say that; I corrected this lie a hundred times during the primary—all to no avail. For Trump-haters/NeverTrumpers, it’s too good not to be true. So what if it’s a lie? To a NeverTrumper, it’s a lie in a good cause.

Smh.

[The original statement was made by either a journalist or a blogger—I believe the former, but it’s been a while since I’ve needed to correct this particular lie, so I don’t have it off the top of my head—and Trump ***repeated/quoted*** what that other source had said. In his actual references this is clear—Trump mentions the fact that someone ELSE said it, not him. Why this is so hard for NeverTrumpers to grasp idk. Just blinded by Trump-hate, I guess.]

[phoneman08]

Is there anyone other than Rand Paul in the Senate who will take a stand against this?

The problem is some Republican Senators are in on it. Remember, this whole Trump is a closet commie meme was started by our beloved GOPe via the Steele dossier.

[sickoflibs]

RE:”She’s going to claim she had to because Russians.”

Similar thought.

Some libs (like CNN, MSNBC) initial reactions were that she only would have unmasked the names if there were serious indications of unlawful/treasonous activity on the Trump team part, and that it just further supports need of a special prosecutor to go after Trump and CO.(or just impeach now)

And that....everything she did was legal.

And that....Just more of Trump trying to distract..