Posted on 04/02/2017 4:39:46 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Apr 2nd, 2017
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt; Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): McConnell; Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley; Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Haley; Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain, R-Ariz.; Dmitry Peskov, press secretary to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Reps. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., ranking member of the House intelligence committee; Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, Freedom Caucus founding chairman; Jason Lewis, R-Minn.
You got it, Chris is a Global Warming radical. He is making Gore look moderate and won’t let him finish a sentence.
CO2, CO2, CO2, where is the proof of Global Warming Chris?
Scott Pruitt EPA head just kicked wall asses butt all over dc, he was great.Now wall ass comparing us to china,what a putz.!!
Walice unmasked as RAT green-weenie, rattling off talking points.
Pruitt running circles around him. Denying CO2 causes respiratory health issues. Walice conflating the two.
Walice brings up Chinese influence on CO2 US production.
Walice interrupts, and then apologizes, asks Pruitt to repeat.
Walice: but but but but...
Scott Pruitt telling Wall ass that we don’t make sh!t up like obama administration did!! Just too good!!!
Now Chris is quoting the UN as proof for Global Warming. Where is the proof Chris, those UN studies have been shown to be bogus.
What if you are wrong Chris. What a radical. Chris Wallace top science scholar of the world. What a joke he is. Settled science.
Pruitt finally had it with his GW and liberal sanctimony that only DC can manage the environment. What a jerk Wallace was today. Pure GW propagandist.
Walice accusing him of endangering air and water standards by slashing EPA.
Pruitt correctly knocked it out of the park by saying every state has a perfectly capable DEP which can deal with the particular issues facing the individual state.
We (Pruitt EPA) reject the idea that people in the states want to taint their air and drinking water, and don’t want to take care of it.
Exactly. If we hold their feet to the fire every time they say this, buy pointing out that the “interference” was nothing more than exposing corruption, this would turn in our favor quickly. Just ask the question before proceeding with whatever else you want to say. It points out to the public that this “Russia interfered...” is designed to confuse the public, it shuts them up, and we can then make our points. Easy. Sometimes the simplest strategy is the best.
Laura Ingraham on panel today.
Firing out more truth and facts on Obama surveillance.
All of these things need to be addressed. First, we need to change who has the ball (go on offense ourselves) by simply asking the question, “How did Russia attack our democracy? By exposing corruption? Don’t you think the people have the right to know? Just precede all of our comments with those simple questions to anyone making that allegation. Simple, turns the tables on them. They cannot defend the corruption that was uncovered and laid bare on Wikileaks.
After we have shut them up with those questions we can make our other valid points.
Did I just see censorship?
The audio went silent for several seconds as Julie Page was speaking, and Walice looked a little rattled as he moved to a different panelist.
And, we need to ask if meddling in another country’s election is sooooo bad, why no outrage over Obama’s meddling in Israel’s election.
Where is the proof Russia gave the Podesta files to WikiLeaks since any 14 yr old could and it most likely was the Seth kid who was murdered.
Excellent post, as always.
Especially enjoyed this...
....They could not come up with the, selected not elected; chant they used for Bush since the Electoral College win was so big, so they came up with this to delegitimize President Trump. They then employed the intelligence agencies to uncover the Trump campaign’s entire phone and email records to find something they could twist into supporting this scheme.
Chris has his liberal hat on tight this morning. His hatred of Trump has unmasked him.
Trump should have taken her in as part of his senior admin management team—with the communications portfolio and more.
Now I am hoping she will KO Carly in the VA senatorial primary. I figure that after three losses, Carly might then give up on elective office.
Scott Pruitt was great...WallAss needs to retire, I could anchor better than him...heck, I think my little brother could do better!
I agree, there is no proof, but it doesn’t matter. We aren’t saying that they did it, only, if the dems are so hell bent on saying they did, how exactly did they interfere? Get them to explain that. By exposing corruption? I always follow with, “We don’t know if it was the Russians or not, but even if it were, they did us a service in my opinion because the people have the right to know.
Mubarak and Gadaffi were unavailable for comment about Russian meddling with our elections.
“And, we need to ask if meddling in another country’s election is sooooo bad, why no outrage over Obama’s meddling in Israel’s election.”
Very good point. All I am saying is that we need to ask the first three questions (How? etc) first, every time they make this allegation. Then, once they are shut up, we can make all the other good points that we need to make.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.