All of these things need to be addressed. First, we need to change who has the ball (go on offense ourselves) by simply asking the question, “How did Russia attack our democracy? By exposing corruption? Don’t you think the people have the right to know? Just precede all of our comments with those simple questions to anyone making that allegation. Simple, turns the tables on them. They cannot defend the corruption that was uncovered and laid bare on Wikileaks.
After we have shut them up with those questions we can make our other valid points.
And, we need to ask if meddling in another country’s election is sooooo bad, why no outrage over Obama’s meddling in Israel’s election.
Where is the proof Russia gave the Podesta files to WikiLeaks since any 14 yr old could and it most likely was the Seth kid who was murdered.
Exactly sure would be nice to see us on offense all the time instead of defending the latest demo lie.
“How did Russia attack our democracy? By exposing corruption? Don’t you think the people have the right to know? Just precede all of our comments with those simple questions to anyone making that allegation. Simple, turns the tables on them. They cannot defend the corruption that was uncovered and laid bare on Wikileaks.
After we have shut them up with those questions we can make our other valid points.
Well stated. We rarely know how to play O. Instead we get caught in too much D, instead of turning the tables on them with irrefutables.
Even in the hearings the key point “ did the Russians hack anything to actually change votes” went unnoticed ......
Also countering Comeys bogus they hate Hillary , then how did she get , legally or illegally more votes....
Easy irrefutables, left out there by allowing the obfuscation to continue