Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Health Care Plan So Simple, Even A Republican Can Understand!
Human Events ^ | Mar 29, 2017 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 03/30/2017 1:28:59 PM PDT by Boomer

Mine is a two-step plan (and you don’t have to do the second step, so it’s really a one-step plan).

STEP 1: Congress doesn’t repeal Obamacare! Instead, Congress passes a law, pursuant to its constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce, that says: “In America, it shall be legal to sell health insurance on the free market. This law supersedes all other laws, taxes, mandates, coverage requirements, regulations or prohibitions, state or federal.”

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aca; ahca; healthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
I think Ann has been reading Free Republic because she has some very good ideas on how to fix the Health Care debacle. The question is can it be done under the senate rules with a 51 majority. If not then, Houston, we have a problem.
1 posted on 03/30/2017 1:28:59 PM PDT by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Hi Boomer —

So, we would still have the individual mandates, and taxes?

Gwjack


2 posted on 03/30/2017 1:31:37 PM PDT by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Should be the new Geico slogan.

So simple even a Republican could do it.

Except it would be a lie.

Because Republicans can’t do anything.


3 posted on 03/30/2017 1:33:50 PM PDT by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Bkmk


4 posted on 03/30/2017 1:36:09 PM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

I like this idea!


5 posted on 03/30/2017 1:36:35 PM PDT by grame (May you know more of the love of God Almighty this day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Unless healthcare COSTS are reigned in by prosecuting collusion and price fixing, no plan will work. No insurance company will charge a premium that loses them money.


6 posted on 03/30/2017 1:43:14 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Insurance is regulated by the states. Its a 10th Amendment issue.


7 posted on 03/30/2017 1:44:47 PM PDT by SpirituTuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

None of that matters. The way to deal with this is to have an insurance company go to one state and offer low-cost insurance plans that don’t comply with the ACA, AHCA, or any other CACA Congress comes up with. It would be politically disastrous for anyone in Washington to take that away from the people who buy that coverage.


8 posted on 03/30/2017 1:46:54 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“It would be politically disastrous for anyone in Washington to take that away from the people who buy that coverage.”

Not sure it was disastrous when this happened with the ocare rollout.


9 posted on 03/30/2017 1:50:30 PM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Won’t work because an ‘entitlement’ which covers pre-existing conditions has been sold to the American public with Obamacare and several millions of folks are using huge amounts of dollars on healthcare under that entitlement.

No politician is going to vote to take it away from sick people. And no party that wants to remain viable will either.


10 posted on 03/30/2017 1:50:34 PM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

What part of “This law supersedes all other laws, taxes, mandates, coverage requirements, regulations or prohibitions, state or federal” is hard to understand?


11 posted on 03/30/2017 1:53:47 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Understand the Left: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

Really? Look at what has happened to the Democrat Party across America since 2010.


12 posted on 03/30/2017 1:54:47 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

This is perfect~!

Just make the new law we want, AND KEEP obamacare.

Just let them try to say they are against it...


13 posted on 03/30/2017 2:04:51 PM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF OBAMACARE REPEAL THAT IS WORSE THAN KEEPING IT ONE MORE DAY***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

REMOVE ALL EXEMPTIONS TOO~!

Congress and the entire government HAS TO be in Obamacare, if they like it that much


14 posted on 03/30/2017 2:10:14 PM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF OBAMACARE REPEAL THAT IS WORSE THAN KEEPING IT ONE MORE DAY***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Hi ctdonath2 —

I suppose that is the problem - I do understand that all LAWS (including federal criminal statutes and every statute on the books of all 50 states) are superseded. I think it’s a bit broad.

Wouldn’t it be simpler to merely state, “Any and all statutes and regulations enacted, or promulgated, under the Affordable Care Act is hereby repealed and held for not. Further, this repeal shall void all laws ab initio?”

We are on the same side, but I don’t think Coulter’s “solution” is what we need to get the job done. Where am I wrong?

All my best,

Gwjack


15 posted on 03/30/2017 2:10:49 PM PDT by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

The argument is that it would not be revenue neutral and thus could not get through on reconciliation thus it would need democrat support to get to a vote.


16 posted on 03/30/2017 2:14:03 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
No politician is going to vote to take it away from sick people. And no party that wants to remain viable will either.

I'm sure there's some truth in what you're saying but I don't see how the country has a choice if we ever want to make health care affordable again.

I think Ann's point is customer A should not be paying more for things he doesn't want or will never use. Let him just pay for a plan that covers what he wants. If customer B wants all that extra stuff they can get it and they can expect to pay more than customer A. Basic free market principles. Basically go back to what it was before the ACA and open up cross border insurance sales using the commerce clause as Ann states.

The pre-existing pool issue will need to be ironed out in some way and may need to be subsidized as much as most of us don't like that idea but as long as it comes out of the general fun and not from all the customer A's then it should work out if done right.

I don't have all the answers but I bet some sharper minds than ours does. Let the right people find and ask them just as long as they are nothing like the bozo's who came up with the ACA. Someone other than the GOPe types who brought up the disaster called AHCA.

17 posted on 03/30/2017 2:15:13 PM PDT by Boomer (The modern day leftist dems are the party of criminally insane propagandists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SpirituTuo
Insurance is regulated by the states. Its a 10th Amendment issue.

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a bingo !

Sheesh, you think Ann would know this.

18 posted on 03/30/2017 2:19:53 PM PDT by onona (Keeping the faith will be our new directive for the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

What are you talking about with “all LAWS (including...) are superseded? What is broad about making it legal to sell health insurance?

Your solution and Ann’s are not mutually exclusive.They are in fact complementary. If O’care was repealed today, your solution, the private health insurance market would still be in complete disarray. While passing your law will not cure the health insurance market, Ann’s law will gradually destroy O’care.

Go Ann’s Law!


19 posted on 03/30/2017 2:23:17 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
The pre-existing pool issue will need to be ironed out in some way and may need to be subsidized as much as most of us don't like that idea but as long as it comes out of the general fun and not from all the customer A's then it should work out if done right.

Congressman Andy Harris has said that the states should maintain the "high risk pool" for those with pre-existing conditions, subsidizing it so that the premiums are not exorbitant but can be higher than the general health insurance population. I didn't pay much attention to what Maryland had in place before Obamacare, but they did have that. They also had too many mandates, but that is another matter. It can be done with the high risk pool and state help.

20 posted on 03/30/2017 2:23:33 PM PDT by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson