Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Gorsuch's Path to 60 Votes 'Closing Fast'
Political Wire ^ | 3/28/17 gmt | Teagan Goddard

Posted on 03/28/2017 5:19:25 AM PDT by drewh

Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch’s path to 60 votes is rapidly closing — setting the stage for a nuclear showdown in the Senate as soon as next week.

Senior Democratic sources are now increasingly confident that Gorsuch can’t clear a filibuster, saying his ceiling is likely mid- to upper-50s on the key procedural vote. That would mark the first successful filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee since Abe Fortas for chief justice in the 1960s.

In the latest ominous sign for the federal judge from Colorado, Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) said Monday he’ll oppose Gorsuch on the cloture vote, which is expected late next week. More than a decade ago, Nelson helped break a filibuster of now-Justice Samuel Alito.

If Democrats successfully filibuster Gorsuch, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has heavily telegraphed that he will invoke the so-called nuclear option to unilaterally change Senate rules with a simple majority vote. And Republicans are confident they’ll have the votes to do it, even as wary as many senators are about forever altering the deliberative nature of the chamber.

“We’re not going to be treated by a double standard,” Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) said in an interview on Monday. “We’ll give our Democratic colleagues a chance to see if they provide the 60 votes; if they do, it’s a moot point. And if they don’t, as I said before, we will confirm him one way or the other.”

Gorsuch got through his marathon confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee without any obvious gaffe or misstep. But Democrats said he stonewalled the committee when pressed repeatedly about his judicial philosophy, and many have since announced they’ll vote to block his nomination.

170324_trump_staff_gty_1160.jpg WHITE HOUSE White House looks to rack up wins after health care calamity By TARA PALMERI So far, only one Senate Democrat has firmly said he’s willing to help advance Gorsuch’s nomination to a final confirmation vote: Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, a moderate who is seeking another meeting with the judge this week to weigh his credentials.

“I’ve always been for cloture,” Manchin told Politico when asked whether he would vote to advance Gorsuch’s nomination, even if he ultimately opposes him. “I’ve always been, basically, ‘I’m not going to filibuster.’”

But several other Democrats on Monday were much less definitive.

Sen. Jon Tester of Montana said he is “still undecided,” as did Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota. Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia said he’s continuing to study Gorsuch’s record and that the threat of the nuclear option wouldn’t influence his choice. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), who like Nelson voted to break the filibuster on Alito, said Gorsuch’s stance on privacy rights would be a central factor in her still-unmade decision on confirmation.

“I’m reviewing the hearings,” said Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), who is facing parochial pressure to back Gorsuch because the judge hails from Denver.

Even Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who told a local reporter in Vermont over the weekend that he is “not inclined to filibuster,” quickly walked that back in a series of tweets Monday amid a flurry of constituent calls organized by liberal groups. The former Judiciary Committee chairman said Gorsuch will be blocked unless the judge “provides real answers” to written questions for the record. Those written responses from Gorsuch are expected back to the committee sometime midweek.

The nuclear battle could erupt as early as next Thursday. The Senate Judiciary Committee will vote to advance Gorsuch’s nomination on April 3 after Democrats successfully secured a one-week delay in the committee. The earliest McConnell could file cloture is Tuesday, April 4, which would tee up a Thursday vote to end the filibuster on Gorsuch’s nomination.

While Republicans are still publicly hopeful that eight Democrats will allow Gorsuch to proceed to a final up-or-down confirmation vote, they’re already preparing for the last ditch, nuclear scenario if — or when — Democrats mount the first successful party-line filibuster in history.

POLITICO Huddle A preview of the day's congressional news — in your inbox. Email Your email… Sign Up By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time. GOP leaders remain publicly and privately confident that Gorsuch will be confirmed to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia before senators leave for the two-week Easter recess in early April. And institutional Republicans long skittish about deploying the nuclear option are now much less nervous about using the provocative procedural maneuver.

“When they’re in charge, they grab power,” Sen. Lindsey Graham said of Democrats. The South Carolina Republican said he would support the nuclear option as a “last resort.”

If Democrats successfully filibuster Gorsuch, Graham added, it would say “that qualifications will no longer matter. There’s no way you can argue that this man’s not qualified. He got the highest rating that the American Bar Association can give somebody. So it means that ideology matters.”

Even Susan Collins (R-Maine), who like Graham is among three remaining senators from the “Gang of 14” that helped defuse a brewing nuclear battle over judicial nominations a dozen years ago, left the door open to backing the nuclear option.

“I would be very disheartened if we had to take that step because I’m a strong believer in the rules of the institution,” Collins said in an interview Monday. “But clearly, it would be unfair if we cannot get a straight up-or-down vote on Judge Gorsuch.”

Democrats are under heavy pressure to oppose Gorsuch from liberal activists emboldened by Friday’s collapse of the GOP effort to repeal Obamacare. The party’s unified opposition during the health care fight has helped left-leaning activists sell their message on Gorsuch: Sticking together on a filibuster can add more political momentum heading into next year’s midterms.

Liberal groups that have fought both Gorsuch and the GOP’s Obamacare repeal bid are now homing in on the judge, cheering the growing number of Democrats declaring their opposition as they plan for a nationwide Supreme Court protest on Saturday.

Sen. Coons on Gorsuch: 'I doubt he is going to get 60 votes' Sen. Coons: Republican nuclear option to confirm Gorsuch is ‘tragic’ By KELSEY SUTTON NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue described the Republican collapse on health care as “obviously a good thing” for Gorsuch opponents. But Hogue expects the GOP to work even harder this week to persuade Democrats to back down from a possible nuclear showdown with McConnell.

“The Trump administration needs a win” to avoid a lackluster first 100 days in office, Hogue said, while conservatives “who held their noses and got behind Trump’s candidacy for this reason specifically — this is absolutely the Holy Grail to them — those are the converging forces that show me they’re going to double down.”

Still, liberals have reason to believe that the tide has turned in their direction, even if a successful filibuster forces McConnell to push a historic change to Senate rules. Several anti-Gorsuch activists question whether McConnell locked down the 51 votes needed to quash the minority’s power to filibuster Supreme Court nominees.

And the Democratic base is feeling good about a minority leader whose early moves had some on the left worried he might be too willing to accommodate the White House. “Schumer has stepped up,” one prominent progressive said.

“Seeing Trump give up the moment going gets tough stiffened Democrats’ spines to fight hard for their principles on Gorsuch,” MoveOn.org Washington director Ben Wikler said. “It’s clear that if Democrats are united around popular principles, and fight back hard, they can win.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 03/28/2017 5:19:25 AM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drewh

Let’s call it the Reed Option....


2 posted on 03/28/2017 5:21:03 AM PDT by Makana (Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life. Hoffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana; All

NUKE EM BABY!


3 posted on 03/28/2017 5:21:30 AM PDT by drewh (>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Good. Stop playing their game.


4 posted on 03/28/2017 5:22:30 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is EVIL and needs to be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

The Democrats are so stupid on this. There will come a time when they will need the filibuster and people would actually support their use of it, but by choosing this battle with this nominee they will force McConnell to do away with it and public support will be with him.


5 posted on 03/28/2017 5:24:56 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

The party of NO!


6 posted on 03/28/2017 5:26:35 AM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Trump needs to have Judge William Pryor and Diane Sykes in the pipeline if Gorsuch is blocked.

Trump needs to let America's enemies, the demoncraps, know that he intends to kick it up a notch.

7 posted on 03/28/2017 5:28:24 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (In God We Trust, In Trump We Fix America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

The Republicans always give the Democrats their SC justices. The Dems never do.

Time to go nuclear. That’s the only game the Dems understand.

It’s called “going Reid”.


8 posted on 03/28/2017 5:33:21 AM PDT by Baldwin77 (They hated Reagan too ! TRUMP TOUGH - AMERICA STRONG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

“If Democrats successfully filibuster Gorsuch,...”

Is anyone actually going to make them FILIBUSTER? I mean talk non-stop? And then they would have to get around the two-speech rule, which they can’t. Those two things can be done and not have to get to the Nuke.


9 posted on 03/28/2017 5:34:23 AM PDT by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

There is no requirement for 60 votes. Therefore, must a filibuster be pre-announced as a requirement on a confirmatiin vote? If it is not announced, then the majority vote will win without resort to the nuclear option.

Devos, for example, was not filibustered was she? She won on a straight majority vote.


10 posted on 03/28/2017 5:38:56 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

If Trump and stupid party members in congress can’t get Gorsuch through, they should just hand the government to the dems and go home now.


11 posted on 03/28/2017 5:42:15 AM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

I would force the democrats to filibuster. Talk until they drop. Then steamroll over them and crush them into the dirt.


12 posted on 03/28/2017 5:43:18 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Theater. The DEMs are negotiating who will vote to allow the Gorsuch nomination to proceed, so the real showdown is delayed until the next SCOTUS nomination. But Gorsuch will be confirmed. One of those "60 votes for cloture, 55 for confirmation" sort of results.
13 posted on 03/28/2017 5:45:33 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

I have SERIOUS doubts dum dum will pull the nuke trigger...


14 posted on 03/28/2017 5:45:59 AM PDT by wyowolf (Be ware when the preachers take over the Republican party...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Makana

Exactly.

‘The Reed Option’.


15 posted on 03/28/2017 5:46:27 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Even Susan Collins (R-Maine), who like Graham is among three remaining senators from the “Gang of 14” that helped defuse a brewing nuclear battle over judicial nominations a dozen years ago, left the door open to backing the nuclear option.

Thank God for small favors, eh Suzy?

I would be very disheartened if we had to take that step because I’m a strong believer in the rules of the institution wild-eyed, baby-killing RAT.

16 posted on 03/28/2017 5:47:12 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (The fear of stark justice sends hot urine down their thighs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Gilibrand says she'll vote for him and that he deserves an up and down vote.

She's up and coming.....and Schumer is down and going.

Looking at that picture, I believe enough Dems will follow Gillibrand's lead to confirm Gorsuch.

17 posted on 03/28/2017 5:47:37 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Fake news. 51 votes. If Bitch McConnell effs this up, he’s worse than Eddie Munster.


18 posted on 03/28/2017 5:48:37 AM PDT by mindburglar (When Superman and Batman fight, the only winner is crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

A recess appointment of Pryor would appear to be in order.


19 posted on 03/28/2017 5:50:21 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Absolutely nothing has changed.......we own the three branches of government and the DEMOCRATS are still running this clown show. Hillary and Obama are running the country via Chuck Schumer.


20 posted on 03/28/2017 5:50:41 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson