“There are those who might be tempted to make light of this..”
LOL
Ya think?
Snowflakes with guns? I am sorry, I just gotta laugh!
If that’s a real photo (at the link), we could be closer to CW II than we think.
This is your “Get the hell out of AZ” PING ;-)
WOW...I am surprised...I was thinking that Liberals actually peed in their under britches at the mere sight of a firearm.
If we look close we can probable see where they took the red flash suppressor off.... PLUS a couple of these guys could shed a few pounds...after all, those poor starving children back in the Middle East....
It sure would be nice to see articles written by people who know how to write in proper English and know how to proofread their writings. A lost art I suppose.
I see nothing in the pic but a verrrrry nice “target rich environment”.
In a fight with certain “conservative” groups, they would cease to exist and be assuming ambient air temperature within about 5 seconds.
Did they have orange tips?........................
Closer ever closer comes the Social War. Over the weekend a pro-Trump group and a anti-Trump group got into a fist fight. Get ready!
Anti-Trump Protestors Mobilize in Phoenix Brandishing Guns!
Someone gave them one class to keep their fingers straight and off the trigger. Which means, they don’t really know what they are doing because of their stances.
Good to see our counterparts on the left exercising their right to bear arms.
When the shooting starts, as it inevitably will, we need to make sure to go after the ones bankrolling the anarchy. That will end it fast.
Doesn’t matter to them which side behaves irresponsibly with guns as long as they can attack 2nd Amendment.
And if presented with a masked, armed attacker, do you have clear, actionable right to active self-defense? If I am out with my kids and am threatened by a masked, armed attacker, I think self-defense applies. Do these idiots really want to test this?
And, as organized effort, when does this become terrorism and insurrection?
https://definitions.uslegal.com/b/brandished/
“Federal law defines brandished as, ‘with reference to a dangerous weapon (including a firearm) means that all or part of the weapon was displayed, or the presence of the weapon was otherwise made known to another person, in order to intimidate that person, regardless of whether the weapon was directly visible to that person’.”
There is a difference between carrying and brandishing. These snowflakes are merely bearing arms - a protected, God-given right, as they would be wise to remember. There is no indication of an intent to intimidate, not when anyone looking at armed snowflakes would be at risk of laughing so hard they could be injured.
Well we are that one that champion the Second Amendment..
so we are all in for guns for self defence...
That’s our game
..its been our game for years and we’ve been very disciplined about it..
So I just remind the left it’s kind of stupid to play the other man’s (Our) game ..
The left trying to take on the right by threatening the right with guns?..
Well snowflake that like you picking a fight with a group of mixed martial arts All Stars. You better be pretty damn sure before you start something
and what they want. They look like ***holes.Did the local media condemn this act of intimidation with deadly weapons?