Posted on 03/22/2017 9:02:54 AM PDT by RummyChick
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHIPNS2oXkI
If Breitbart has gone to war with Bannon..and it is not part of a subterfuge
http://www.spin.com/2017/03/breitbart-health-care-steve-bannon-reince-preibus/
Why would Breitbart ban a critical question to the WH. Something about all of this is weird...so is Breitbart thinking it is covering for the CIA by not allowing the question?
is that his point? After 3 minutes all I’ve heard is blathering about losing his job.
Get to the point man!
There are a lot of things that make no sense to me on so many levels.
Like Jaime Gorlick being let into the inner sanctum.
This story is yet another that I just don’t understand.
And the Masons.
For those that need it in less than 140 characters
https://twitter.com/stranahan
Don’t think so...he was springboarding off of this on his twitter feed.
But I could be wrong. It seems like he is using it for a source of info.
Do I have to watch 20 minutes to find out what his question was?
The question is at about 4:30 into video
Nope,,,read his twitter feed
He might, but "access" and "control" are different things. I just assume that news, including Breitbart, is controlled such that certain stories are stifled. "If you knew the truth, it would blow your mind" sort of thing.
-- VOA has often been thought of the Propaganda Arm of the government. ... Supposedly they require two sources for a story. --
VOA is openly propaganda. As far as having two sources, that's an easy rumor mill trick, just create a straw outlet, and voila, now there are two. The press cross-cites each other all the time. Somewhere, in EVERY story, there is a SINGLE root source of the information, reality (or fakenews, as the case may be). If the rumor-monger tells two outlets the same fiction; or the rumor-monger is a team of two, is that "two independent sources?" Hell no!
-- It is interesting that "the propaganda arm" of the US government is publishing a Crowdstrike story and Breitbart won't allow questions about it. --
All part of gaslighting the public. Some of which is no doubt unintentional, but it happens. Maybe this is just a disgruntled reporter, and the boss dislikes him for unstated reasons, just using "WH visit" as a pretext, or objecting to "WH visit" for reasons other than the Crowdstrike connection to deep state.
CrowdStrike ( the company hired by the DNC ) was funded by Google Capital, an arm of Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company. Eric Schmidt, the chairman of Alphabet, has been a staunch and active supporter of Hillary Clinton and is a longtime donor to the Democratic Party. So in other words, the company that "investigated" the hack, was a company run by Hillary's largest donor. Hardly an independent investigator.
DNC ‘Russian Hacking’ Conclusion Comes from Google-Linked Firm
Oh maybe I was wrong. This article predates VOA
https://medium.com/@stranahan/timeline-of-crowdstrikes-russia-hacks-ukrainian-military-debacle-comey-s-cleanup-7871c1710961#.d7qxfgrmr
is that his point? After 3 minutes all I’ve heard is blathering about losing his job.
Get to the point man!
Agreed. He could have put all of it in about 1.5 - 2 minutes. If he had done that, people might watch it and he wouldn’t come across as such a conspiracy nut. Also, the video should be less about himself.
Thanks, that’s better. I think there is more than Crowdstrike involved here, if the Awan brothers have been taking IT hardware out of US government offices and then re-installing it via their company Nanoset Technologies.
Agree that the servers need to be examined top to bottom.
Access and Control are two different things.
I doubt Bannon controls Breitbart even though this kind of subterfuge has been long done in various organizations.
Securities industry come to mind.
It’s not above Ruthless Bannon to fake a fight, though. Who knows. Maybe Breitbart IS on the outs with him.
link?
How is it a conspiracy nut.
Breitbart won’t let him ask the questions.
Crowdstrike issues have come out.
There are questions to be asked.
On the thread
https://medium.com/@jeffreycarr/the-gru-ukraine-artillery-hack-that-may-never-have-happened-820960bbb02d#.
from link
Crowdstrike’s latest report regarding Fancy Bear contains its most dramatic and controversial claim to date; that GRU-written mobile malware used by Ukrainian artillery soldiers contributed to massive artillery losses by the Ukrainian military. “It’s pretty high confidence that Fancy Bear had to be in touch with the Russian military,” Dmitri Alperovich told Forbes. “This is exactly what the mission is of the GRU.”
Crowdstrike’s core argument has three premises:
Fancy Bear (APT28) is the exclusive developer and user of X-Agent [1]
Fancy Bear developed an X-Agent Android variant specifically to compromise an Android ballistic computing application called Попр-Д30.apk for the purpose of geolocating Ukrainian D-30 Howitzer artillery sites[2] The D-30 Howitzers suffered 80% losses since the start of the war.[3]
If all of these premises were true, then Crowdstrike’s prior claim that Fancy Bear must be affiliated with the GRU [4] would be substantially supported by this new finding. Dmitri referred to it in the PBS interview as “DNA evidence”.
In fact, none of those premises are supported by the facts...
?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.