The court created a constitutional crisis where none existed.
So what? It's not the first time, and won't be the last. Roe v. Wade, Obergfell, those too are constitutional crises. Many many others.
As long as the public gives courts this power, the courts will continue to abuse it.
Exactly, and two of Mark Levin’s Liberty Amendments deal with tyrannical courts.
First, repeal the 17th Amendment. A majority of state appointed senators will not appoint radical anti-10th Amendment judges.
Second is an amendment to empower states to overturn court decisions on a vote of 34 state legislatures.
“As long as the public gives courts this power, the courts will continue to abuse it.”
Congress determines the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Congress can remove the authority of the federal courts to act in matters of immigration and naturalization.
The Senate approves the appointment of federal judges. The House and Senate acting together can remove federal judges from the bench.
Congress is elected by the public. The public reelects over 95% of Congressmen and Senators each election cycle. Apparently the public is satisfied with their representation and the conduct of federal judges. Congress seems to feel no pressure from the public to do anything about judicial overreach.
The uniparty and the politicized Judiciary do not intend to allow Trump and the people to rule. The consent of the governed needs to be withdrawn. It may take peoples' courts determining the fate of these rogue judges to restore border sovereignty to the US.
“As long as the public gives courts this power, the courts will continue to abuse it.”
As long as The Executive and Legislative Branches allow themselves to be cowed by Judges handing down illegitimate rulings like this, there will be no change.
What is APPROPRIATE, in this case particularly, is for The Executive and Legislative Branches to IGNORE this pontificating Hawaiian poltroon, call the Judge out as a tyrannical, activist, anti-Constitutional FRAUD, and throw the Judge off the Bench. Even the bare act of acknowledging this ruling gives it more credence than it deserves, and THAT is INHERENTLY STUPID, because NOW we’ve obliged ourselves to go through all this unnecessary, dog-and-pony song-and-dance appeasement of a political left that — when it’s all said and done — WILL NOT BE APPEASED ANYWAY! The ENTIRE EFFORT is a SHAM AND A MOCKERY! IT IS THE VERY ZENITH OF STUPID to act like this ruling amounts to more than the head-on collision of a mosquito with a battleship.
The Judge is out of line, the complainant has no standing, the ruling is null and void, and ought rightly be ENTIRELY, and THOROULGHLY IGNORED.