You don’t have a right to throw water on someone, but that’s not a lethal threat. Face it, it’s murder. Not first degree, but murder. He killed a guy for the sole and simple reason that he’s a confrontation addicted jerk.
[[You don’t have a right to throw water on someone, but that’s not a lethal threat. Face it, it’s murder.]]
You left out “And then began acting in an aggressive manner threatening manner” Again- it’;s not a matter of degree of force cocnernign the assault- it’s what happens ‘along with’ the act
Again- it’s not about the popcorn- it’s about the popcorn starting something that was perceived to be getting dangerous- rightly or wrongly- by the shooter- that has to be determined- It ‘Appears’ that the dead fella was the one to break the law- and then escalated the issue- (IF the shooter’s lawyer is telling the truth about what transpired- a jury will have to determine that)
One of the things that came up at the time was the fact that Reeves' wife was an eyewitness, and she remained mum.
Of all people, she would know for a fact if he was a "confrontation jerk".
If he abused her all these years with his CAJ, maybe she'll end up with him in prison, and her with the retirement cash, and out from under his thumb.
Wonder who she's rooting for? :)