[[You don’t have a right to throw water on someone, but that’s not a lethal threat. Face it, it’s murder.]]
You left out “And then began acting in an aggressive manner threatening manner” Again- it’;s not a matter of degree of force cocnernign the assault- it’s what happens ‘along with’ the act
Again- it’s not about the popcorn- it’s about the popcorn starting something that was perceived to be getting dangerous- rightly or wrongly- by the shooter- that has to be determined- It ‘Appears’ that the dead fella was the one to break the law- and then escalated the issue- (IF the shooter’s lawyer is telling the truth about what transpired- a jury will have to determine that)
“Aggressive and threatening manner” only according to the murderer.
You got one thing right, it’s not about popcorn. But you got the rest wrong. What it is about is a jerk with a history of forcing confrontations with people while armed finally doing what every non-idiot on the planet knows somebody like that will do. He murdered someone. Period. And denying it just makes you look stupid.
Exactly right.