BREAKING NEWS: FISA WARRANTS FOR TRUMP WIRETAPPING CONFIRMED (14:06)
WIKIFACTS
Published on Mar 9, 2017
More Trouble for Obama, FISA WARRANTS was Confirmed this further proves President Trump was right.
Posted on 03/10/2017 7:25:44 PM PST by Yosemitest
Bump
“Fascinating” , as Spock was wont to say.
CC
We need to get serious and start sending these criminals to jail.
Are these the warrants that Comey, et. al., denied knowing about?
If this were actually confirmed, it would be news somewhere besides a panel on Hannity.
Bigger than Watergate.
MUCH bigger.
Land of the FREE...?
Bookmark
The left-brained media, like the clown news network CNN, will not publish the news they do not like and publish their own fake news.
Interesting.
WHERE would it be news.... CNN, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, CBS,.....REALLY!!!
Starting with the Chicago punk that pretended to be president 2009-2017.
I expect Bill Clinton to have another clandestine meeting with Loretta Lynch any day now.
This might change the PH balance of the water in DC. Particularly those who can be nailed down as pushing for the warrants in Congress. And those aiding and abetting those pushing for the warrants.
Maybe Ryan will find that there is more time, and schedule, to hammer out both a repeal of ACA and tax reform.
(JIM0216 hat tip)......the issue isn't whether Trump was wiretapped (Obama admitted such and apparently, there was a FISA warrant issued for the wiretapping). The issue is whether there was probable cause to issue a warrant. Probable cause is defined as the reasonable likelihood that a crime is or has been committed by the person or at the place designated........
===============================================
(REAGANGENERATION2 HAT TIP)---Trump should be able to review all 2 or 3 FISA requests (if he hasn’t already), and then let Congress determine if the requesters lied about the probable cause justifying them......then (1) you’d prove perjury, and, even worse, (2) the intent was to abuse executive power.
===========================================
A good beginning....and then it gets downright lethal for the Obama gang:
Via Breitbart, JOHN HAYWARD observed that the FISA court may have approved a warrant submitted without Trump’s name but “which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump.”
Ergo the most serious legal jeopardy that might be faced would be (a) perjury for lying to the FISA court, and, (b) the dissemination of collected intelligence that should have been kept tightly classified.
===========================================
It is also entirely possible that Obama and his legal team may have perjured themselves before the FISA court by willfully withholding material information in order to manipulate the FISA court’s willingness to permit the government surveillance.
FALSIFYING GOVT DOCUMENTS would fall under the Crimes Act of 1958. Moreover, falsifying official documents is the criminal MO to hide larger crimes.
EXCERPT A person falsifying documents can be held criminally liable if they are deliberately acting with the intention of deceiving or defrauding another party.
Falsifying documents is a very serious offense and is generally classified as a felony. This means that a person charged with falsifying documents may be subject to the following legal penalties:
◾Having to pay a monetary fine
◾Incarceration in a prison facility
Depending on the gravity of the offense, as well as individual state laws, falsifying documents can result in a prison sentence of 5-10 years.
And if official government documents or govt authorities were involved, the legal penalties may be more severe. Legal penalties may increase with repeat offenses.
Many different types of acts can be considered as falsifying a document, including:
◾Altering or misrepresenting fact-based information
◾Stating false information when requested to provide truthful statements
◾Forging a signature
◾Using official letterheads without authorization
◾Knowingly using or distributing a fake document
The penalty for falsifying government documents is outlined in the Crimes Act of 1958.
.
>> “If this were actually confirmed, it would be news somewhere besides a panel on Hannity.” <<
You voted for the bitch?
The MSM is ignoring this. - That in itself is solid confirmation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.