Anyone who cares about freedom would come to work for me with their medical insurance and related issues already in order, without relying on me to pay for them.
Do you not understand the concept, that has been what most companies have done for years, where they cover part of your insurance, while taking money out of your check, as part of your benefits package?
You stated that as an employer you would want to know people’s genetic information. Disgusting.
Anyone who cares about freedom would come to work for me with their medical insurance and related issues already in order, without relying on me to pay for them.
~~ I did not see that you answered my questions listed post #101 to your post #27 (For what purpose do you “damn sure” want to know? From what I read, the information is supposed to be limited to use in wellness plans...Would you be using it for termination purposes? ~~
So, I will ask you to answer these regarding your post #122:
Are you actually a business owner charged with hiring a large number of employees?
How exactly would it happen that ‘Anyone who cares about freedom would come to work for you with their medical insurance and related issues already in order without relying on you to pay for them.’ Seriously, exactly what do you mean by this?? How would they accomplish this?
For now, it is impossible to buy individual policies at a reasonable cost. So, are you planning on paying substantially more in wages to provide for the increased cost of “Anyone who cares about freedom would come to work for me with their medical insurance and related issues already in order the employee caring about freedom???” If you support freedom loving people, perhaps you should. That is done with consultants—they make a much higher hourly wage than regular employees because they don’t have the benefits...
Or perhaps are you thinking some other employer will pick up the tab of your employee through a spouse?? Or parents policy will pick up the cost for their children’s insurance.
It is easy to say “Anyone who cares about freedom” would do this or that. The reality is far different.
With all due respect, it sounds to me like you would be hiring a lot of temps/consulting employees, H-1B or H-2B visa holders because they are the only ones who would be able to meet your stipulation “would come to work for me with their medical insurance and related issues already in order.”
How does that help Freedom loving US citizens? It doesn’t.
Nor does insisting that “Anyone who cares about freedom would come to work for me with their medical insurance and related issues already in order, without relying on me to pay for them” address the problem that this thread was focusing on—mandatory genetic testing of employees—and if you think it will stop with employees, you are not thinking ahead—employers will want the DNA of spouses and children of employees, doctors will want DNA samples to suggest preemptive lifestyle changes, schools will want DNA to ward off those susceptible to latent conditions, etc. We are heading down a dangerous road not limited to employers.
NO ONE SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO ANYONE’S DNA.