Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: montag813

She was pretty well savaged as a bad actress in the “Daily Mail” on another thread. Hilarious and brutal. It seemed that her main draw is that she is a feminist which does not conjur the image of a loving, gentle and absolutely not frothing at the mouth crazy “Belle”.


44 posted on 03/06/2017 3:39:08 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Caipirabob

Heh, you thought Emma Watson was bad, try Belle’s own creator for the Disney version, Linda Woolverton. She makes Watson seem like a moderate. I’m not kidding, just watch the Maleficent movie that she made, I dare you to find ANY human males that she DOESN’T denigrate as either being complete monsters or buffoons. And what’s worse, she actually stated that she inserted that kind of theme in the 1991 version of Beauty and the Beast and made clear she based Belle on the 1960s-1970s feminist movement.

Let’s hope someone replaces Iger and actually tries to bring it back to what Walt Disney envisioned, including actually greeting people who visit the parks who AREN’T merely suits.


83 posted on 03/17/2017 3:32:37 PM PDT by otness_e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson