[Alberta's Child]

With the clarity of hindsight, of course, rather than throw red meat at the rabid left and MSM, it would have been better to simply announce that a Special Prosecutor would be appointed.

Why announce the appointment of a special prosecutor?

There isn't even any suggestion that an investigation is ongoing. As far as what is known publicly, Sessions basically recused himself from a non-existent investigation.

[Nita Nupress]

There isn't even any suggestion that an investigation is ongoing. As far as what is known publicly, Sessions basically recused himself from a non-existent investigation.

That's what kills me. IF this is true that he did this on his own, what was he thinking? I guess he's so used to hanging around with the Uniparty weinies in Congress, he forgot he could actually act like a winner.

Actually, I'm still thinking it's all another trap. More popcorn...

[frog in a pot]

There isn't even any suggestion that an investigation is ongoing.

It is not a question of whether there is any investigation going on. It is a question of how do we take the initiative and resolve the problem. Otherwise, America will be reading about this for the next 8 years and the issue might even find itself in the history books.

Why announce the appointment of a special prosecutor?

In order to provide the American public with an objective analysis and resolution of the allegations.

Imagine instead we were talking about AG Lynch. What would you want in such case? Would you be satisfied with Lynch or Obama saying, "The minute we are aware of any credible evidence we will start the process?"

Have a nice weekend.