I thought it was similar to many of his other speeches, it was great, but I have seen most of it before
BUT, for the people who haven’t seen him live and unfiltered by CNN, he did the perfect thing - he toned down some things as to stay in a more positive light and not give any ammo to the left. For example, he said we are starting the wall build, but he didn’t say, ‘and Mexico will pay for the wall’. He left out the more controversial campaign style remarks and probably converted some low info and democrat voters that have been in the media fog since the election!
I thought it was similar to many of his other speeches, it was great, but I have seen most of it before
BUT, for the people who haven’t seen him live and unfiltered by CNN, he did the perfect thing - he toned down some things as to stay in a more positive light and not give any ammo to the left. For example, he said we are starting the wall build, but he didn’t say, ‘and Mexico will pay for the wall’. He left out the more controversial campaign style remarks and probably converted some low info and democrat voters that have been in the media fog since the election!
~~Freeper formerly known as bushwon ;)
He also explained, for the benefit of those (libs) who don’t get it, WHY he was planning to do what he was planning to do.
The libs have always made great use of people in the gallery with tear-jerker stories. (Poor little girl without health insurance, etc.) Trump did exactly the same thing (because appeal to emotion is apparently the only thing that registers with lefties) by having victims of illegals in the gallery. It’s much harder for them to argue with that. You want more parents whose children were murdered by illegals?