Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A single mom used her tax refund to pay her rent—for the entire year
CNBC ^ | 2-25-17 | Kathleen Elkins

Posted on 02/25/2017 4:52:28 PM PST by TaxPayer2000

When Christina Knaack received a $5,600 tax refund, she didn't head to the mall or book a trip to the Caribbean. The South Carolina-based single mom of two kids used it to pay her rent … for the entire year.

"Instead of buying my kids the latest Jordans or fancy electronics I paid my rent for the YEAR," Knaack writes on Facebook. "I'm a single mom and I do it all by myself on a minimum wage job. I know that a roof over my kids head is what's important."

Since Knaack uploaded the picture of her rent receipt on Feb. 22, the post has gone viral and racked up more than 320,000 Facebook "reactions."

"You see too many posts now saying, 'Oh I got my kid the latest Jordans.' Or, "Look, my 7-year-old has an iPhone 7,'" Knaack says on FOX Carolina. "People lose sight of what's important."

Now that Knaack's rent is covered, "I don't have to worry about my kids saying, 'Mommy, I need this,' and I can't get it because I'm still trying to debate if I can pay my light bill or if I can pay my rent," she tells FOX.

Plus, she now has an extra $450 a month (the cost of her rent), which she plans to spend on fun activities with her kids.

If you're one of the millions expecting a tax refund this year, consider using it to improve your financial situation, whether that means chipping away at your rent or mortgage like Knaack, funding your retirement accounts or investing in your career.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last
To: babyfreep

I thought it was Carter, he said Reagan, you say Nixon and Wikipedia says Ford. sigh

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sigh all you want, I am correct.

I said, Nixon first proposed it (He did) and Ford signed it into law (He did). I never said that “Nixon did”


101 posted on 02/25/2017 11:30:10 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

OK. You are correct.


102 posted on 02/25/2017 11:32:58 PM PST by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

I’m with you on that, how on earth would she be entitled to such a refund? Free money for her from people that actually have to pay taxes? In all my years working, andd between the wife and I we had some really good years, never ever did we get anywhere near that kind of refund.


103 posted on 02/26/2017 1:56:55 AM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

HOW did she get $5600.00 back on a minimum wage job??? She most likely paid NO FEDERL income Taxes, but she got $5600.00 from OTHER taxpayers!! Something is terribly wrong.


104 posted on 02/26/2017 3:20:02 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Must be nice to get a refund. For some reason, I always have to write a check. Oh well at least she didn’t blow it on junk.

OTOH, lots of folks would love to be in a position to have to pay at the end of the year. Took me a while to balance mine out but next year I should be getting less than $400 back - both retired and I'm using my military retirement as the balancer to get as close to zero as possible come tax time.

105 posted on 02/26/2017 3:52:50 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neal1960
IMO, she did not pay her rent for a year. The taxpayers did.

If she had no job and was purely drawing from the various welfare programs available, you would be paying her roughly 10 times that. Let that roll around in your gut for a spell.

106 posted on 02/26/2017 4:01:22 AM PST by BlackbirdSST (Trust not one word from the enemedia, until it can be independently verified!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Phil DiBasquette

“pre-pays their rent giving their landlord an interest free loan”

Not to mention if something happens to the home (fire, flood, etc.) she will need a place to live, and hope that the landlord is smart enough to have the money on hand, and ethical enough to refund her, ASAP. At minimum, she should have put it in a bank account, to draw on, monthly. Other Freepers have pointed out even better uses of the funds.

I do give her credit for not blowing it, however.


107 posted on 02/26/2017 10:09:13 AM PST by jttpwalsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

http://www.epi.org/publication/ib370-earned-income-tax-credit-and-the-child-tax-credit-history-purpose-goals-and-effectiveness/

“The earned income tax credit (EITC), first proposed in the early 1970s, was signed by President Ford. It was later substantially expanded by President Reagan, who deemed it “the best anti-poverty, the best pro-family, the best job creation measure to come out of Congress” (Snyder 1995). However, in recent years, the EITC has often come under political attack. It is criticized (sometimes implicitly but often explicitly) because it eliminates the income tax liability of many low-income workers, thus, it is claimed, giving them no “skin in the game” in support of the common good.1 Others criticize it for redistributing income to “people who have never paid a dime in their lives” but nevertheless “get a check from the government” (Sandmeyer 2013).”

Um, OK, Nixon.

One inherent problem with the credit in that it incentivizes people to report self employment income that they did not actually have in order to claim refunds of EITC and ACTC credits larger than their self employment tax.


108 posted on 02/26/2017 5:47:00 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

You are correct. My reply #108 to Gaffer.


109 posted on 02/26/2017 5:50:07 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

I guess I should have said “proposed by Nixon.”


110 posted on 02/26/2017 7:05:22 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

It’s just another form of welfare. I guarantee she didn’t pay the IRS an extra $5400.


111 posted on 02/26/2017 11:43:18 PM PST by Organic Panic (Rich White Man Evicts Poor Black Family From Public Housing - MSNBCPBSCNNNYTABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

And I read somewhere on the internet that it was Regan’s tax credit, but it looks like we’ve all talked out the right answer.


112 posted on 02/28/2017 7:02:41 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson