[Chickensoup]

Yiannopoulos questioned age-of-consent laws and suggested that minors as young as 13 were “sexually mature” enough for relations with adults. In it, Yiannopoulos said:
Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old, who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet who have not gone through puberty.
_______________

Actually there is a difference between the prepubescent attraction and the post-pubescent attraction.

Humpbert Humperbet in Lolita is a prime example of a pedophile, he had no interest in Lolita after she achieved puberty.

I don’t have a problem with men or women becoming sexually involved with post pubescent adolescents. I was married at age 16.

[pgkdan]

I don’t have a problem with men or women becoming sexually involved with post pubescent adolescents. I was married at age 16.

I have a VERY big problem with adult men raping 13 year old boys and I'm amazed that anyone of this forum would not be!

[DJ MacWoW]

I see Conservatives are still shooting one another. Sad. Milo is not a Conservative, he's a Libertarian, however he was winning with the college crowd. He HAD to be stopped. Berkley didn't work so they edited a video and used a second one with imprecise language and BINGO! They got Milo. And the partially informed fall for it.

The circular firing squads are one of the reasons that I seldom post anymore.

[Agamemnon]

I was married at age 16.

So was my heterosexual grandmother.

"Yiannopoulos said: 'Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old,..."

So he's a pederast, then.

Assuming you are even a conservative yourself (and I can think of liberals I know who are rightfully repulsed by pederasty) does the fact that Milo clearly endorses pederasty as opposed to what he defines as pedophilia make you feel better about him?

Can you add? Since when is casual pederasty with a 13 year old of the same sex comparable in any way to heterosexual marriage of a 16 year old woman to a presumably older man?

He is not carrying a torch for conservatism. His mission is to normalize perversion within the ranks of conservatism.

Homosexuality destroys ALL that it touches. On this board it is destroying the common sense of a number of those particularly in the Gen-X to Millennial set who say they ascribe to conservatism - the next generation of conservatism - the one that Milo intends to influence and has said as much.

The homosexualiztion of conservatism is not what is needed now that our side is winning.

From what I have read on this board in the last 6 months, most real men aspiring toward affirmation of principled conservatism have tolerated what he is and what he does, simply because he pisses off the left. Conservative women posters like yourself on the other hand seem inclined to swoon over this guy like he's their best gay TV-soap opera boyfriend.

Let him continue to buttf--k his way to stardom pissing off the left. Real conservatives don't need his antics to make our points.

Those 6 Breitbart writers/contributors are standing up as they have probably seen what the corrosive effect the Milo-philes are having at Breitbart.

The sooner conservatives ditch him the sooner the conservative movement can dispatch with the confusion and dis-unification of purpose and principle his lifestyle perpetuates.

FReegards!