Replies

I was married at age 16.

So was my heterosexual grandmother.

"Yiannopoulos said: 'Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old,..."

So he's a pederast, then.

Assuming you are even a conservative yourself (and I can think of liberals I know who are rightfully repulsed by pederasty) does the fact that Milo clearly endorses pederasty as opposed to what he defines as pedophilia make you feel better about him?

Can you add? Since when is casual pederasty with a 13 year old of the same sex comparable in any way to heterosexual marriage of a 16 year old woman to a presumably older man?

He is not carrying a torch for conservatism. His mission is to normalize perversion within the ranks of conservatism.

Homosexuality destroys ALL that it touches. On this board it is destroying the common sense of a number of those particularly in the Gen-X to Millennial set who say they ascribe to conservatism - the next generation of conservatism - the one that Milo intends to influence and has said as much.

The homosexualiztion of conservatism is not what is needed now that our side is winning.

From what I have read on this board in the last 6 months, most real men aspiring toward affirmation of principled conservatism have tolerated what he is and what he does, simply because he pisses off the left. Conservative women posters like yourself on the other hand seem inclined to swoon over this guy like he's their best gay TV-soap opera boyfriend.

Let him continue to buttf--k his way to stardom pissing off the left. Real conservatives don't need his antics to make our points.

Those 6 Breitbart writers/contributors are standing up as they have probably seen what the corrosive effect the Milo-philes are having at Breitbart.

The sooner conservatives ditch him the sooner the conservative movement can dispatch with the confusion and dis-unification of purpose and principle his lifestyle perpetuates.

FReegards!

My sources at BB won’t comment. But overall I support your comments here. If Milo says some 13-year-olds are mature enough, then certainly some 12-year-olds, too, right? And what about those exceptional 11-year-olds?

We have age distinctions in laws for a reason. There will ALWAYS be an exception, which is exactly why you need the rule.

I agree with some here that to some degree Milo is a self-promoter-—but that doesn’t necessarily bother me. He is fearless when it comes to going into hard-left places. That said, Custer was fearless . . . and stupid. Merely being fearless while having a core of the wrong principles -—not all of them, of course, but a significant element-—doesn’t advance conservative ideas. It only attacks liberal ideas, which isn’t always bad.

I love what Milo has done to the Left, but as you say, there is a very real and serious corrosive effect of homosexuality on a culture, and to ignore it is to court peril. Trump, to this point, has basically said “Courts have said homosexuals have certain civil rights and I’m going to observe them.” He has, to my knowledge (rightly) made no statement about Milo one way or another. We have to be careful to not just leap blindly to support someone because the left attacks them. I’m not going to keep rehashing this: I read his FB reply, and was not satisfied. It seems, based on an earlier transcript, that he is fully ok with men having sex with “mature” 13-year olds, and I cannot support that view in any way shape or form.

I hope he can review and revise his thinking, at least conclude he was seriously wrong on this, because his role as a goad in the side of the left is needed. But there are some costs we should not sustain.

Oh yes Agamemnon the never Trumper , I remember you...still doing the work of the left behind our lines eh!

Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old,...” it is pederasty! Where does Milo endorse pederasty?

You just wrote the same words as Milo said, so that must mean you endorse pederasty!

Lord remove the idiots and hyopcrits from our ranks they want us to lose.