Breitbart Employees Threaten Walk-Out Over Milo

Washingtonian ^ | 20 Feb 17 | Elaina Plott

[elhombrelibre]

All is not well at Breitbart News.

A senior editor at the right-wing publication tells Washingtonian that “at least a half-dozen” employees are prepared to leave the company if Milo Yiannopoulos is not promptly fired. A second Breitbart source confirms this estimate.

Yiannopoulos, himself a senior editor at Breitbart, was booted from his speaking slot at this week’s Conservative Political Action Convention (CPAC), following taped revelations in which he appears to endorse pedophilia.

[elhombrelibre]

Would Christ want him to repent his sins or to celebrate them?

[fuzzylogic]

And how much of it is “putting on a show”? Do you know? Do you really think he’d be reaching so many without the flamboyance and, instead, being the stereotypical Christian? It’s part humor that doesn’t offend the younger generation, they listen. He communicates with humor, so he plays up the homo-ness, jokes about it constantly. When serious his message is not in favor of the gay lifestyle, he knows the pitfalls and has discussed it.

I don’t know what he does in private, just like I don’t know what you do. I’m getting tired of the self-righteousness here.

[Agamemnon]

I was married at age 16.

So was my heterosexual grandmother.

"Yiannopoulos said: 'Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13 years old,..."

So he's a pederast, then.

Assuming you are even a conservative yourself (and I can think of liberals I know who are rightfully repulsed by pederasty) does the fact that Milo clearly endorses pederasty as opposed to what he defines as pedophilia make you feel better about him?

Can you add? Since when is casual pederasty with a 13 year old of the same sex comparable in any way to heterosexual marriage of a 16 year old woman to a presumably older man?

He is not carrying a torch for conservatism. His mission is to normalize perversion within the ranks of conservatism.

Homosexuality destroys ALL that it touches. On this board it is destroying the common sense of a number of those particularly in the Gen-X to Millennial set who say they ascribe to conservatism - the next generation of conservatism - the one that Milo intends to influence and has said as much.

The homosexualiztion of conservatism is not what is needed now that our side is winning.

From what I have read on this board in the last 6 months, most real men aspiring toward affirmation of principled conservatism have tolerated what he is and what he does, simply because he pisses off the left. Conservative women posters like yourself on the other hand seem inclined to swoon over this guy like he's their best gay TV-soap opera boyfriend.

Let him continue to buttf--k his way to stardom pissing off the left. Real conservatives don't need his antics to make our points.

Those 6 Breitbart writers/contributors are standing up as they have probably seen what the corrosive effect the Milo-philes are having at Breitbart.

The sooner conservatives ditch him the sooner the conservative movement can dispatch with the confusion and dis-unification of purpose and principle his lifestyle perpetuates.

FReegards!

[Voegelin1]

I think everyone should read Chicken-soup’s excerpt from Milo's Facebook page. Milo is different from most of us, but he is a fierce supporter of President Trump, conservative in his core beliefs, and spreading the conservative word to audiences of young people most of us could never reach. This is the young generation, most of whom have no problems with gay issues, and are receptive to the provocative manner in which Milo fights for the Conservative cause. He has been destroyed by the Nevertrumpers, Even McMuffin and the Bill Kristol elites.

[Robert DeLong]

So you think, intelligently, that all births by women are the same? Or do you think, intelligently, that each woman has a unique experience where some similarities exist, but certainly not all do? If the latter, than you know that blanket statements are wrong. No I do not agree with what Milo was saying, nor do I agree that all homosexuals engage in the activities he stated either. That was my point.

[Zionist Conspirator]

Thanks for making my point for me. So you’re one of those that believes if somebody has same-sex attractions they can’t be saved? That they’re automatically “the enemy”? Wrong! Do you think Christ would consider him an enemy?

I am not a chrstian and don't believe in "chrstian 'salvation.'" G-d deals with the human race via law, and one of those laws is that male homosexuality is universally forbidden. And it's not about being "perfect." We all have sins we struggle with and are ashamed of, but Yiannopolous celebrates his and has turned previously moral conservatives into apologists for homosexuality so long as it is "on our side."

Unfortunately, on today’s campuses, if Milo were straight his serious messages would never have reached the massive audience it has. The left wants him destroyed and you’re doing their work for them.

There's more to conservatism than merely reacting to the left and automatically celebrating every person and thing they are attacking. Only a total lack of principals would lead to such a "conservatism."

Has it occurred to you that maybe God is using him?

Has it occurred to you that G-d "uses" everyone and everything, including not only Milo but also all the things and people you detest? But does that mean we're supposed to accept everything and not fight? You've obviously never heard of G-d's all-embracing Providence, which governs everything hat happens in the world at large and to each and every created thing. Why don't we stop fighting the left because G-d is using the left? Why don't we stop fighting islam because G-d is using islam? You're being hypocritical here. I realize that you believe that G-d is fighting a "war" with an evil counterpart that you call "the devil" or "satan," but you're wrong. There's only One G-d, He has no counterpart of any kind, and there is no cosmic war against evil. There is only G-d.

What is your great contribution?

I'm still fighting against homosexuality. What are you doing besides apologizing for it?

[Georgia Girl 2]

Milo does not endorse pedophilia. This is just more fake news. CPAC has never been gay friendly. My guess is this whole meme is being pushed by never Trumpers.

[LS]

My sources at BB won’t comment. But overall I support your comments here. If Milo says some 13-year-olds are mature enough, then certainly some 12-year-olds, too, right? And what about those exceptional 11-year-olds?

We have age distinctions in laws for a reason. There will ALWAYS be an exception, which is exactly why you need the rule.

I agree with some here that to some degree Milo is a self-promoter-—but that doesn’t necessarily bother me. He is fearless when it comes to going into hard-left places. That said, Custer was fearless . . . and stupid. Merely being fearless while having a core of the wrong principles -—not all of them, of course, but a significant element-—doesn’t advance conservative ideas. It only attacks liberal ideas, which isn’t always bad.

I love what Milo has done to the Left, but as you say, there is a very real and serious corrosive effect of homosexuality on a culture, and to ignore it is to court peril. Trump, to this point, has basically said “Courts have said homosexuals have certain civil rights and I’m going to observe them.” He has, to my knowledge (rightly) made no statement about Milo one way or another. We have to be careful to not just leap blindly to support someone because the left attacks them. I’m not going to keep rehashing this: I read his FB reply, and was not satisfied. It seems, based on an earlier transcript, that he is fully ok with men having sex with “mature” 13-year olds, and I cannot support that view in any way shape or form.

I hope he can review and revise his thinking, at least conclude he was seriously wrong on this, because his role as a goad in the side of the left is needed. But there are some costs we should not sustain.

[fuzzylogic]

I’m not apologizing at all. Just picking my battles. If you can’t see the global war for our minds - resulting in death and suffering vs life and prosperity, we have nothing more to discuss. If we shut down everyone that you don’t believe is moral enough we’ve already lost, nobody will meet your standard - or the next Freeper.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Milo said he used the age of 13 because that’s when he had his first sexual encounter.

He was abused by the clergy as a boy and has repeatedly spoken against pedophilia as well as outed three people for participating in it.

This is the never Trumpers at work.

[DJ MacWoW]

A beautiful example of what you are trying to convey.

Billy Graham volunteers pray for Milo

[stocksthatgoup]

Sound like NeoCons

[ssfromla]

Bookmark

[RegulatorCountry]

He’s been a very effective force for opening the eyes of college age and younger people to the absolute stupidity of the left and this is invaluable.

To my knowledge he’s never claimed to be “conservative,” he states he’s libertarian.

Nobody’s proposed to elect him President or make him pastor, his sexual mores have always been well outside of the social conservative norm.

However, he’s condemned actual pedophiles and publicly outed and denounced at least three in his column.

He’s a cultural Christian who supports religious influence upon western society, while not being the finest example of a Christian himself, not by a long shot.

He’s an ally. His even being invited to CPAC at all, let alone as keynote speaker, reeks in hindsight of setup.

They tried and failed to get social conservatives riled up to reject Trump numerous times. They appear to be succeeding here.

Make no mistake, it’s political. They want to shut him down, not because of highly questionable statements regarding sexual morality, but because of his effectiveness on college campuses.

Making common cause with a person or group does not entail approving of every single thing that person or group says and does.

We’re our own worst enemies at times, with the bandwagon mentality. I’m quite capable of making clear what I do and don’t support, even when the two are both present in the same individual.

This is a prime opportunity to love the sinner and hate the sin, he’s done a lot of good for us and can continue to do so.

[fuzzylogic]

Thanks for posting. Precisely.

[ConservativeWarrior]

I’m sure everyone on this site has been attracted to a person under 18 years of age at some point.

Some 15 year old people look 20. Some 20 year old people look 15.

Pedophilia is being attracted to someone who looks like a kid, not being attracted to someone who looks like an adult but is under 18.

Statutory rape is a completely separate, but related, matter.

[free_life]

Milo has said he hates being a homosexual and wants to not be attracted to men. That he was considering a Christian deliverance therapy to become a heterosexual. He has said transgenderism is a mental illness and opposes gay marriage.

While he is at times peverse in his speaking and it is not what I want to hear, he has done more for conservatism than all you armchair self righteous hyocrits combined. You hate him because his sin is different than yours. If we say we have not sinned, we make him (Jesus) a liar, and his word is not in us. 1 Jn 1:10 Self righteous hypocritical are the biggest sinners of all, they point to others sins so their sins won’t be exposed to the Light. Jn 3:19-21

Universities are the battleground we must win or we will eventually lose politically to the left. The left hate Milo and are cheering your throwing him under the bus, you fool!

At worse he mispoke but as far as I can see in his offending words, he spoke the truth.

[DJ MacWoW]

You're welcome.

Btw, I checked the author of this piece and she pushes Vox articles, screaming liberal site, and likes Evan McMullen, a never Trumper. She also congratulated the New York Times on their Polk Awards for fake news on Trump. Are we surprised? No.

You have a wonderful day.

[kanawa]

You seem to enjoy worshipping pedophiles

Knock it off, jerk

[elhombrelibre]

Are you tired of him talking about providing fellatio? You can denounce stereotypical Christianity all you want. You can say he’s doing the Lord’s work and he’s good for conservatism. I don’t agree unless we’re frauds.