Posted on 02/20/2017 7:57:17 AM PST by davikkm
Several of the organizations openly supported the Hillary Clinton campaign and worked to defeat Donald Trump.
On Saturday CPAC announced Milo Yiannopolous would be speaking at CPAC 2017.
On Sunday the #NeverTrump Reagan Battalion released very sordid audio of Milo Yiannopolous discussing sex and 13 year-olds. (For the record Reagan Battalion blocked The Gateway Pundit from reading their tweets.)
Never trust a #NeverTrumper.
This is a disgusting story all the way around.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Watch Milo approval ratings go up after this.
The #NeverTrumpers are as disgusting as the Soros pigs.
#Never Trumpers = Mitt Romney and his Mormon cabal???
I like he angers the left he he should not be the face of conservatism. There’s a reason the military banned homosexuals so many years. All loose cannons.
Yeah, I’m a bit uncomfortable with this embracing of Milo.
Of course gays own liberals, their next step is to own the conservatives as well, and guys like Milo may be part of that plan. Proceed with caution, here.
Agreed...
that doesn’t change the fact Milo is a huckster and fraud who did defend older men teaching 13 year old boys the ways of the world and then explained it wasn’t pedophilia once a child had experienced puberty.
Why he’s speaking at CPAC is beyond me...
Milo doesn’t produce anything himself beyond his “persona”... he doesn’t write anything. The articles referenced by Hillary Clinton as offensive were written by a tiny Canadian woman named Margaret Maclellan, who also was the figure head for his self-serving Privilege Grant. He refused to communicate with her, took all the money donated and snorted it. He isn’t getting any portion of his $250,000 advance... at least that’s what his business manager has been telling people. At this point they need to resuscitate his image and replace the money he stole. None of this is conjecture btw... people have been writing about his issues for years.
But go ahead, he does pose on instagram with stage money and wears opulent faux pearls and paste diamonds.
I agree. I am not sure what I think of Milo. I’ve listened to him a few times and been disgusted by his language. I’ve also listened to him at a tamer venue and thought he was quite charming.
I just can’t see embracing homosexuality just because a very smart and brave homosexual says the right things, politically speaking. Is that all it takes? I don’t care for effeminate men, and the more outlandish they are, the less I can listen to them. I have to say that I like Milo, I feel a little sad for him, and, speaking from a motherly view, I would love to see him find God and be healed, fully.
Milo actually did defend pedophilia.
I’m out with any one who thinks that is normal.
Sick! If CPAC doesn’t disinvite him, its mainstreaming pedophilia chic.
This is fake news from the cucks.
And let’s not forget that he makes a handsome Marie Antoinette! /sarc
It’s extremely difficult to tell when Milo is being Milo or when he is being himself. That’s why I have him on Ignore.
“Yeah, I’m a bit uncomfortable with this embracing of Milo.”
Same here, he gives me the creeps.
Milo is most likely David Brock 2.0. That being said the “Reagan Battalion” on twitter is Hillary Criminal enabling scum.
The man is a fame whore who says whatever brings him notoriety.
There is nothing conservative about him. People who defend him as a victim are doing exactly what they accuse liberals of doing.
As a conservative, I have core values and I’m not abandoning them to be hip/cool.
If you subscribe to Milo’s sick views, you’ve already failed the IQ test.
Yeah, I don’t know why Breitbart has him as an editor. I suspect Andrew would be turning over in his grave.
My daughter doesn’t believe anything Breitbart publishes because of Milo.
For that matter it’s well know than Matt Drudge is gay.
The liberal press is totally insane. But between the gays and the nevertrumpers, I’m not sure the conservative press is all that trustworthy.
Fortunately Trump bypasses them all.
Okay, what’s the real deal on Milo? I’m open to hearing his side of the story before I comment.
Milo is a tool. A bull in a china shop who smashes orthodoxy. I’m not a fan either but I can see why he’s useful in combating the rampaging Media-Democrat complex.
True. But Drudge doesn't flaunt it like Milo does.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.