Agreed...
that doesn’t change the fact Milo is a huckster and fraud who did defend older men teaching 13 year old boys the ways of the world and then explained it wasn’t pedophilia once a child had experienced puberty.
Why he’s speaking at CPAC is beyond me...
Milo doesn’t produce anything himself beyond his “persona”... he doesn’t write anything. The articles referenced by Hillary Clinton as offensive were written by a tiny Canadian woman named Margaret Maclellan, who also was the figure head for his self-serving Privilege Grant. He refused to communicate with her, took all the money donated and snorted it. He isn’t getting any portion of his $250,000 advance... at least that’s what his business manager has been telling people. At this point they need to resuscitate his image and replace the money he stole. None of this is conjecture btw... people have been writing about his issues for years.
But go ahead, he does pose on instagram with stage money and wears opulent faux pearls and paste diamonds.
And let’s not forget that he makes a handsome Marie Antoinette! /sarc
It would be nice if everyone could come to an agreement on just what exactly is the sexual nature of boys over 13. Because some of the same people here on FR who would absolutely choke in rage over Milo's remarks would smirk over a pretty 25 year old female teacher having sex with a boy that age. We all know the Not Guilty Brigade...