Trump administration won’t appeal ruling against immigration order to the Supreme Court

Washington Post ^ | 10 Feb 17 | Washington Post Staff

[SkyPilot]

The Trump administration can wage a legal battle in the lower courts to address more squarely whether the president's immigration directive violates the Constitution. The White House is also mulling whether to rewrite the executive order. No matter what, the administration faces a difficult fight to restore the ban.

This is a developing story. It will be updated.

[eartick]

And all the while, terrorists are coming into our Country.

Time to ball up President Trump and play 'em as you hold 'em.

We are with you on this one and will go the mile with you

[eartick]

I am all for a re-issue but he should have them stacked up so time does not waste and the gate does not open to allow the bastards in.

The gate has been open a week now and over 10,000 VISA holders have entered our shores.

President Trump jumped the gun and failed, made one deal too many or was not prepared and hopefully learned a lesson that these liberal and RINO bastards are out to get him and this chess game is for AMERICA.

[RetiredArmy]

Won’t do any good. At best a 4-4 tie right now. If Kennedy sides with the communists/socialists/homos/liberals of the Less Than Supreme Court. I would not be surprised if he did side with them.

[Road Warrior ‘04]

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/5318443255001/?#sp=show-clips

[datricker]

For short term victories the left puts you and I at risk. This is so much BS. I understand Trump needs to do the strategic thing and he is good at that but congress needs to de-establish or jurisdiction strip the ninth into oblivion or we have little clusters of liberal judges probably controlled by Soros running our border policy in the near term.

This will not be forgotten come next election time. President Trump will be able to say this congressman/woman was fighting with/against me to stand up to these judges to keep you and your family safe, to keep the nation secure.

The next islamic terror attack is on the judiciary branch they wanted to make laws and enforce policy well here is the blow back on the flip side

[Jim W N]

Where’s your alternative suggestion? It’s not enough to say something essential won’t work if you haven’t thought through a viable alternative.

Meanwhile, barring a better, viable alternative to Trump moving ahead on this, a Congressional impeachment of Trump would be without constitutional merit as Trump is the only party in this case trying to uphold the Constitution.

The answer is Trump should take his case to the American People citing Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution MANDATING the feds PROTECT the U.S. from invasion. Trump should urge his fellow Americans to call their congressmen to support his efforts to protect the American People and ask Congress to fix the existing law or pass a new one pursuant to Article IV Section 4.

[Sam Gamgee]

Someone correct me if I am wrong, but the basis of the stay against Trump is:

1) The 9th circuit thinks all travelers, not just green card holders, should get recourse, like a trial before being rejected.

2) They are arguing it is a Muslim ban, without really clearly indicating how that is the case?

[Eleutheria5]

It can’t be avoided. When you have contradictory rulings from two judges in two different venues, SCOTUS has to get involved.

[RipSawyer]

The Davy Crockett motto, “First be sure you are right, then go ahead.”

[TomasUSMC]

Just Establish a higher Court than the 9th. The Constitution says the Government can establish courts. Nuke the Filibuster today, Establish a new court tomorrow and appeal to the hand picked Conservative America Loving Judges.