Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DHS: Border wall will cost over $21 billion to build
Hotair ^ | 02/10/2017 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 02/10/2017 10:28:38 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Twelve billion here, fifteen billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money. Put them together, though, and it comes close to the actual projected cost of the border wall. Reuters reports that the Department of Homeland Security’s proposal runs far ahead of the funds that Republicans in Congress planned to allocate:

President Donald Trump’s “wall” along the U.S.-Mexico border would be a series of fences and walls that would cost as much as $21.6 billion, and take more than three years to construct, based on a U.S. Department of Homeland Security internal report seen by Reuters on Thursday.

The report’s estimated price-tag is much higher than a $12-billion figure cited by Trump in his campaign and estimates as high as $15 billion from Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

The report is expected to be presented to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary John Kelly in coming days, although the administration will not necessarily take actions it recommends.

The plan lays out what it would take to seal the border in three phases of construction of fences and walls covering just over 1,250 miles (2,000 km) by the end of 2020.

It’s not the only variance from first projections. The new DHS study projects that the wall will be completed by late 2020, assuming Congress begins allocating the funds by May, presumably in the upcoming omnibus bill. That’s longer than the two-year estimate Kelly gave Congress just a week ago, which will certainly raise questions about his preparation for that testimony.

It also makes the issue of funding a little more fraught. Initially, Ryan indicated that the House would pursue the funding in the fall, as part of the FY2018 budget process. A two-year completion schedule at that point would have meant that the wall could be completed by late 2019, enough ahead of the presidential primaries to claim victory on a long-made promise from Republicans. A three-year-plus schedule suggests that the wall may not be complete until midway through an election year — and that gives Democrats plenty of reason to start blocking the funding, starting in two months during the omnibus FY2017 negotiations.

The time difference matters a lot more than the cash difference, though the latter is not exactly a few coins in the cushion. A nine-billion-dollar miss might seem like the lunch budget for the federal government, but it would actually be about 0.1% of all discretionary spending projected for FY2017 (although the appropriation will probably stretch out over the three-year period, too). At DHS, it’s more significant; the proposed FY2017 appropriation was $48 billion, so a $9 billion miss is rather big. Republicans might feel pressure from their conservative ranks to find the money by cutting other spending, and that will no doubt fuel opposition from Democrats.

It’s still probably better to have this fight earlier rather than later. If Ryan and McConnell wait until fall, the momentum for the project could stall, and Trump’s electoral mandate might have dissipated. Kelly better deliver it on time, and on budget, if Republicans want to reap political benefit from it. Besides, if they wait any longer, the bill’s just going to keep getting bigger and bigger.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bordersecurity; borderwall; buildthewall; first100days; homelandsecurity; trump45; trumpwall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

1 posted on 02/10/2017 10:28:38 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Big deal! 21 billion? Think of the savings when we spend over a hundred billion on illegal welfare


2 posted on 02/10/2017 10:29:59 AM PST by notaliberal (St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t give a DAMN it it’s $150 billion or more.

BUILD THE WALL!


3 posted on 02/10/2017 10:30:12 AM PST by BBB333 (The power of TRUMP compels you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We can save that much by not having to handout freebies and “entitlements” to illegals over six months.


4 posted on 02/10/2017 10:30:39 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (As long as tyranny exists, the Constitution and Bill of Right will never be "outdated" or "obsolete")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sanctuary City savings + 2% fee on “remittances” to Mexico, done.


5 posted on 02/10/2017 10:30:47 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s worth it. Build it.


6 posted on 02/10/2017 10:30:48 AM PST by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Build. It.


7 posted on 02/10/2017 10:31:17 AM PST by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
But don't worry...it'll be completed sooner and under budget.

It has to be done....The Dems have been jerking this around for 8 years....

There was ALWAYS supposed to be a wall.

Please be aware that wall and fence were used interchangeably in earlier talks about the "wall".

8 posted on 02/10/2017 10:31:30 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Fake news. Report from Obama’s DHS.


9 posted on 02/10/2017 10:32:17 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ ("It's a war against humanity!" Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Compared to $6 trillion spent in the Middle East....


10 posted on 02/10/2017 10:32:18 AM PST by Navin Johnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

Use non-union labor. Cost$ will plummet 50%. If only New Mexico and California were Right to Work States this would be possible.


11 posted on 02/10/2017 10:33:32 AM PST by donozark (Lock her up! Kick 'em out! Build the wall! GO TRUMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Worth every penny.

Not mentioned is the swcureiry if thweews a mass economic meltdown or doisease epidemic. We need to coontrol oiur pir borders.


12 posted on 02/10/2017 10:33:42 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t believe anything DHS produced recently. It is full of obozo supporters


13 posted on 02/10/2017 10:35:04 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Who told Reuters the details before telling the head of DHS?


14 posted on 02/10/2017 10:35:05 AM PST by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m sure the wall needs to be built, but let’s not kid ourselves. We’re not making Mexico pay for it by putting a tariff (tax) on their imports because Mexico doesn’t pay for our tariffs. The American consumer does. Under that scenario, the American consumer pays for the wall. Maybe that’s OK.

The wall needs to be built and unless Mexico is somehow cowed into handing over some or all of the $21 billion, the American consumer will pay for it. So be it.


15 posted on 02/10/2017 10:35:07 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal
Think of the savings when we spend over a hundred billion on illegal welfare

And that's an ANNUAL cost.

16 posted on 02/10/2017 10:35:15 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The wall will pay for itself just in saved medical costs for drug overdoses.

Build it!


17 posted on 02/10/2017 10:35:32 AM PST by dangerdoc ((this space for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t care Don’t care Don’t care.


18 posted on 02/10/2017 10:37:06 AM PST by onona (Keeping the faith will be our new directive for the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The purpose of this “leak” was to weaken the resolve to build the wall. They better get this started. The Rats the GOPe and the courts loading are loading the cannons to stop the wall.


19 posted on 02/10/2017 10:37:11 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Just get on with it already.

The patrols can be set up and put in place before the wall is even built.

20 posted on 02/10/2017 10:37:21 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson