“The DNA lies sometimes”............was she an OJ juror?................
She must have another brother named Dna.
Re: “The DNA lies sometimes”...
Maybe she’s just really bad with numbers. Because I think the probability with DNA matches are somewhere in the neighborhood of several billion to one. Maybe she thinks that’s a good probability that the “DNA” found on the dead girl’s body wasn’t his.
While DNA doesn’t “lie,” it should not be accepted as the end-all of evidence in a case. There are examples of DNA transfer from medics working one person going on to the body of the next person they worked. Sometimes busy inner-city medics are so much “on the go” they don’t always change out everything. My nephew works one such ambulance in downtown Atlanta, known locally as “the stab cab.” He’s basically a combat medic and it’s pretty messy.
But anyway, evidence should be more than just “we found your DNA there.” Of course, that whole “under the fingernails” thing just might be what the state needs. I’m just saying that you need to look at all possibilities before jumping to a conclusion.
As for pulling Chanel’s name out of a black hat, well, Teresa, it takes a little more than that, you know.
This is why you need to get the DNA good and drunk before you question it. In vino veritas!