Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schumer: Trump's Supreme Court pick will need 60 votes
The Hill ^ | 2/1/17 | JORDAIN CARNEY

Posted on 02/01/2017 11:14:36 AM PST by jeannineinsd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: A CA Guy

Exactly. Even the Wikipedia page on the 2018 Senate race only now shows 12 of the 23 are safe, considering the 2014 voting index.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2018


61 posted on 02/01/2017 11:37:41 AM PST by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Trumps sister sounds like a perfect NY liberal judge
Maybe he can nominate her to replace Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg
More Schumer tears


62 posted on 02/01/2017 11:38:03 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

It’s not for Chuckie to decide this. And it would not be an historic step to use a simple majority to confirm.


63 posted on 02/01/2017 11:38:03 AM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Trumps sister sounds like a perfect NY liberal judge
Maybe he can nominate her to replace Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg
More Schumer tears


64 posted on 02/01/2017 11:38:10 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

His sister is too old.


65 posted on 02/01/2017 11:39:52 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

We’ll take the constitutional option, please.


66 posted on 02/01/2017 11:39:55 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

Isn’t Collins the one that voted to take Obamacare out of committee? Or was it the other female traitor.


67 posted on 02/01/2017 11:40:44 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

Gorsuch won’t be confirmed without going nuclear.

Dems want to push the Trump is Hitler narrative and forcing the rule change is the way to do that.


68 posted on 02/01/2017 11:40:53 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

This Bolshevik revolution needs to be crushed!


69 posted on 02/01/2017 11:41:17 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

Schumer is playing politics, GASP. Gorsuch will be confirmed.


70 posted on 02/01/2017 11:41:34 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

The lying bastard is lying again................


71 posted on 02/01/2017 11:42:02 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

I hope they fight it and lose the fillibuster.

Trump is motivated and then the cowards in Congress would have no choice but to do dramatic reform.

They could undo the last 70 years of communist nonsense in 90 days.


72 posted on 02/01/2017 11:42:09 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

The Dems in general will go through the motions of trashing Gorsuch just on principle (i.e. what they deem to be principle), then let him in. It’s just sparring practice for the real battle, which will be for the Ginsburg replacement that will actually change the Court.


73 posted on 02/01/2017 11:42:14 AM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd; xzins

IMHO, he’s going to end up with 80 votes. If the dems filibuster this one, then the nuclear option will strip them of power in the future. I suspect a lot of dems will try to appear “reasonable” on this one and wait to go to war on the next one.

But then democrats are proving themselves to be as stupid as Republicans.


74 posted on 02/01/2017 11:42:32 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I predict Schumer will tell a select group of Democrats to vote for Gorsuch just so they can avoid the humiliation of fighting a losing battle, while sanctimoniously claiming that they held the GOP to the 60-vote requirement.


75 posted on 02/01/2017 11:42:41 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

I’d really like to see a response like this from one or more GOP senators:

GOP Senators: Congratulations Gorsuch on Being Confirmed - The Certain Outcome Whether by 60 Votes or Less!


76 posted on 02/01/2017 11:43:56 AM PST by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd
We shall see won't we!! Let's see if McConnell has as strong a fortitude as Dirty Harry had.

Trump: I will tell McConnell to 'go nuclear' if Democrats hold up Gorsuch nomination


77 posted on 02/01/2017 11:44:01 AM PST by Cheerio (The unknown President #44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

Schumer needs to get Gorsuch confirmed, because he NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS to preserve the filibuster for the Ginsburg seat.

I expect minimal resistance, and even a few speeches about how great Gorsuch is - showing how reasonable the Dems are “if the nominee is not a radical”.

If Schumer gives up the filibuster now, over Gorsuch, he can’t block Atilla the Hun replacing Ginsburg.


78 posted on 02/01/2017 11:44:01 AM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

Rats ALWAYS get their nominees for USSC. Just look at the incompetence, lack of skill, weak intellect and record of being political as a judge of obola’s picks, yet Pubs voted for them as the President gets their pick unless they are completely off the chart.

But, when it comes to putting the shoe on the other foot, Rats NEVER reciprocate.

So, I see absolutely no loss to the Pubs for going nuclear, because if Rats get back in power, the Rats will always get there choice whether it is 51 or 60, whereas we don’t.


79 posted on 02/01/2017 11:44:23 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

That would pretty much be the end of the filibuster for all nominations, forever. In turn that puts a huge premium on Senate control.


80 posted on 02/01/2017 11:45:16 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson