Posted on 01/23/2017 9:22:02 PM PST by TigerClaws
Mike Cernovich of reader-supported Cernovich Media filed a motion to intervene in Giuffre v. Maxwell, a case involving a sex trafficking victim and an accused sex trafficker. Read: British socialite to face Epstein accusers defamation lawsuit.
A woman who claimed that New York financier Jeffrey Epstein trafficked her for sex when she was a teenager may pursue a lawsuit accusing British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell of defamation for calling her allegations lies, a U.S. judge ruled. In a decision on Monday night, U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet in Manhattan denied Maxwells request to dismiss Virginia Giuffres lawsuit.
Ghislaine Maxwell filed a 70-page motion for summary judgment with the court under seal. As the civil lawsuit is a public proceeding, the case should never have been sealed.
Cernovich Media retained leading first amendment attorney Marco Randazza to represent the interests of the public and the many readers and listeners of Cernovich Media.
Marc Randazza, Cernovichs attorney, commented:
The courts belong to the people, not the parties. The First Amendment demands that court proceedings be open to the public. How can a free press do its job in keeping a watchful eye over the workings of government if those workings are sealed? There may be rare circumstances where limited amounts of information are subject to redaction. But, for a motion for summary judgment to be entirely under seal? Even the CIA releases documents with a few words un-redacted.
Why isnt the New York Times filing lawsuits involving pedophiles? Where is the Washington Post? Where, for that matters, is the Associated Press? Does Jeffrey Epstein have some dirt on our media CEOs and leading journalists?
Cernovich Media is shining a spotlight on the rich and powerful. As the motion states:
Part of Cernovich Medias mission is conducting investigative journalism in pursuit of an open government. Maxwells currently sealed pleadings, and anticipated future related documents, prevents the public from learning about wrongdoing by high level government officials, media moguls and high profile business people.
Cernovich Media is an organization whose mission is to use and promote investigative journalism as a tool to expose corruption and abuse of public power by promoting transparency, accountability, and public awareness, by involving private citizens in the discussion of these problems. Cernovich Media cannot conduct its Fourth Estate function if this Court allows the Parties to conduct their dispute outside of the normal sunlight of transparency and accessibility. The public has a right to see Maxwells Motion for Summary Judgment and the press is here to show it to them.
A hearing on Cernovich Medias motion to unseal records will be held on February 17th.
ORDER: The motion to intervene filed January 19, 2017 shall be heard at noon on Thursday, February 16, 2017 in Courtroom 18C, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street before Judge Robert W. Sweet.
You may read the full motion and Cernovichs affidavit here:
Giuffre v. Maxwell Motion to Unseal Giuffre v. Maxwell Cernovich Declaration
Cernovich Media is committed to fighting against the fake news media establishment, and will fight in court to ensure the truth is brought to light.
This could take down Bill, Hillary and John Podesta. It would be GLORIOUS without a lib in the WH to protect them.
Allegedly it could take down Prince Andrew. It will be interesting to see if any moves from across the sea come to block this.
I was told it could take down TRUMP!
“This could take down Bill, Hillary and John Podesta. “
I’m working trying to get Reid indicted on racketeering, which ties to some common criminality with Podesta. With any luck, their whole evil empire goes up in flames. It’s huge.
Yep——that is the system of the psychopathic elite sodomites, since the French Revolution to smash monogamy/marriage. (Godwin)
They provide “honey pots” (little boys and girls (like Paul Bonacci and Cathy O’Brien from the CIA MK-ULTRA Operation Mockingbird))-— to all rising, promising politicians/secret society inductees, so they are controlled for the rest of their lives. Libido Dominandi.
They probably have pictures of Justice Roberts with some little boys (also Rubio and Obama). Just an educated guess. They are controlled puppets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KgkiruMB4g
I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3516833/posts?page=4#4
chuckles wrote:
“I was told it could take down TRUMP!”
And your source is?
Is like early pizziagate stuff?
bfl
Cernovich better up his security operations.
If he is shot in the back of the head twice then that will confirm the Clintons were involved in child trafficing and Pizzagate.
Freerepublic!
I spoke about this before the election and was told basically to shut up because Trump was in on it. We have evidence that Clinton went down to the island 26 times mostly with Secret Service. I felt this would be a slam dunk for the Trump team. Never brought it up. Dershewitz( sp) was accused by eyewitnesses and skated. There are other names like an English Prince. So I posted here for someone to exploit it. I was told to drop it because Trump was involved.
I'm not saying he was, I just didn't understand why it was swept under the rug during the campaign. The evidence for Clinton was right there in the open. seemed like a slam dunk to me.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3243315/posts
Quotes Trump praising Epstein and knowing him for years. It might just be a scab you don't want to scratch.
I am amazed you can even THINK that way.
I would not care WHO was involved, if it is child sex crimes they should all be shot and then pissed on.
Would you want to cover it up if it did involve him? Shame on you.
I don;t believe for a second that it did- but IF it did, I would not care. Prosecute anyone - no matter who it is - ESPECIALLY if it is powerful GOP. Clean that scum out and maybe we’ll get some real progress.
Now to vote for Clinton, I would have to swallow all the crap I knew they were capable of, so it was an easy choice for me to vote for Trump. But I can tell you with my 65 years of experience that the shine will soon fall off Trump as it has for all the others. He was a Dem up until a couple of years ago. His kids couldn't even vote for their dad because they are STILL registered dems. Ivanka will work on her child care give away that we can't pay for. Trump just met with the unions. He's now talking about health care for everyone. I don't yet know where the shine is going to fall off, but it will come.
The whole campaign, he bolstered the dreams of Christians while waving his rainbow flag.
I've enjoyed my stint here with FR, but something happened awhile back and changed the atmosphere here. I've been a member here for a long time and have never been treated like I have for the last year. I figure I don't want to be a member of a conservative "Huffpost". It's Jim's site, not mine. If I'm to be muzzled here, fine. They made it plain that my opinions were not welcome here anymore.
Now re read your post to me. Do you REALLY mean, after all that was done to get Trump elected, that you would rejoice that trash would come out on Trump? I was the one trying to get it exposed in the press and FR was saying to shut up and you tell me "Shame on you". I suppose I could print my OPUS and have 92 replies to not let the door hit my ass, but who really cares? This is a blog, not church. I loved Reagan, but did he have skeletons? Why did he leave Lebanon with his tail between his legs,...mistake! I still like Bush 43, but he definitely made mistakes. I don't expect Trump to walk on water, just do some of the stuff he promised. Does anyone think Pence would build a wall? Pence is a good man, but I think he smells of the old way. He would NEVER be involved in anything immoral, but would roll over for Pelosi thinking "Can't we all just get along?".
If you supported Trump, you had to know what you were getting. It was all hanging out there. If you wanted a preacher, you should have supported Cruz. You had plenty of choices in the primary to pick a saint. After the primary, you punch Rep. That's the way of the world unless you are so unprincipled that you would vote for Hillary, sodomite baby killer that she is. (Romans 1:32) People feel superior when they say they are "Independent", but it really means they have no principles. If you would take Hillary and all that comes with that over Trump, sorry, I'm out. If Cruz will run in 2020, I will support him again. If he's picked for SCOTUS, fine, I'm good with that. If Cruz runs and loses, that the way politics works. But I have no illusions about Trump.
*IF* it came out on ANYONE (and it was true) that they were abusing children I would rejoice that children were being saved.
I don’t care who.
Well, here is a link to Ted Cruz’s humble Christian flag. This came out during the Indiana primary...
http://getoffthebs.com/heidi-cruz-confronts-fiorina-for-sleeping-with-lyin-ted-cruz/
We already know differently, because they pulled out ALL the stops to bring down Trump.
If there was any real dirt against Trump, we would have seen it already.
I bet in 10 minutes I could find a site that shows Trump with a space alien and somebody quoting him saying she was much better than Melania in bed. Does that make it news because there is a website?
Herman Cain had several women come out against him. When he bowed out, the women stopped. He too is a Christian man that would not have done what they said. Now are you going to believe that about Cruz and Cain, but pooh pooh the Trump women? Do you believe Trump was golden showering with prostitutes in Russia? They have video, so they say, or is that fake news?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.