Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“The House Republicans’ move would take away both power and independence from an investigative body, and give lawmakers more control over internal inquiries.”

Can we hope that they may be a little more ruthless than the board has been?

Is this next one for real or did you add it as satire?

“It also came on the eve of a historic shift in power in Washington, where Republicans control both houses of Congress and where a wealthy businessman with myriad potential conflicts of interest is preparing to move into the White House.”


5 posted on 01/02/2017 8:39:32 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sequoyah101

With regards to your tagline, that is exactly what I have had to exchange. Shocking, but all too real.

There’s a few on this board that have been through it and mentioned it a few times over the years.

It’s a whole new ballgame.


7 posted on 01/02/2017 8:42:04 PM PST by SaveFerris (Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Sequoyah101

I don’t falsify fake news. It’s already fake enough. :)


9 posted on 01/02/2017 8:42:47 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (President Trump is coming, and the rule of law is coming with him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Sequoyah101

Is this a move to end what has really been a panel to bury ethics violations?


29 posted on 01/02/2017 9:08:19 PM PST by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Sequoyah101

” .... a wealthy businessman with myriad potential conflicts of interest is preparing to move into the White House.”

Darn tootin! We want a president who has NO resume, who’s never run a business, who is dependent on the ‘good will’ of the wealthy (or the taxpayers) to afford their luxurious lifestyle and to fund their campaigns. Not potential conflicts of interest there! That is the successful formula for the NYT.


38 posted on 01/02/2017 9:40:17 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Sequoyah101

**myriad potential conflicts of interest**

New York Times, pick up the white phone. Your bias is showing.


40 posted on 01/02/2017 9:49:45 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Sequoyah101

Hillary was not wealthy and had no conflicts of interest with the Clinton Foundation.

There. I finished their paragraph.


49 posted on 01/03/2017 1:07:57 AM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson