Posted on 12/27/2016 5:54:37 AM PST by Kaslin
Did the community organizer from Harvard Law just deliver some personal payback to the IDF commando? So it would seem.
By abstaining on that Security Council resolution declaring Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal and invalid, raged Bibi Netanyahu, President Obama "failed to protect Israel in this gang-up at the UN, and colluded with it."
Obama's people, charged Bibi, "initiated this resolution, stood behind it, coordinated on the wording and demanded that it be passed."
White House aide Ben Rhodes calls the charges "falsehoods."
Hence, we have an Israeli leader all but castigating an American president as a backstabber and betrayer, while the White House calls Bibi a liar.
This is not an unserious matter.
"By standing with the sworn enemies of Israel to enable the passage of this destructive, one-sided anti-Israel rant and tirade," writes the Washington Times, "Mr. Obama shows his colors."
But unfortunately for Israel, the blow was delivered by friends as well as "sworn enemies."
The U.S. abstained, but Britain, whose Balfour Declaration of 1917 led to the Jewish state in Palestine, voted for the resolution.
As did France, which allied with Israel in the Sinai-Suez campaign of 1956 to oust Egypt's Col. Nasser, and whose Mysteres were indispensable to Israel's victory in the Six-Day War of 1967.
Vladimir Putin, who has worked with Bibi and was rewarded with Israel's refusal to support sanctions on Russia for Crimea and Ukraine, also voted for the resolution.
Egypt, whose Gen. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi was welcomed by Bibi after his coup against the Muslim Brotherhood president, and who has collaborated with Bibi against terrorists in Sinai and Gaza, also voted yes.
China voted yes as did Ukraine. New Zealand and Senegal, both of which have embassies in Tel Aviv, introduced the resolution.
Despite Israel's confidential but deepening ties with Sunni Arab states that share her fear and loathing of Iran, not a single Security Council member stood by her and voted against condemning Israel's presence in Arab East Jerusalem and the Old City. Had the resolution gone before the General Assembly, support would have been close to unanimous.
While this changes exactly nothing on the ground in the West Bank or East Jerusalem where 600,000 Israelis now reside, it will have consequences, and few of them will be positive for Israel.
The resolution will stimulate and strengthen the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israel, which has broad support among U.S. college students, Bernie Sanders Democrats and the international left.
If Israel does not cease expanding West Bank settlements, she could be hauled before the International Criminal Court and charged with war crimes.
Already, J Street, the liberal Jewish lobby that backs a two-state solution in Palestine -- and has been denounced by Donald Trump's new envoy to Israel David Friedman as "far worse than kapos," the Jewish guards at Nazi concentration camps -- has endorsed the resolution.
The successful resolution is also a reflection of eroding support for Israel at the top of the Democratic Party, as a two-term president and a presidential nominee, Secretary of State John Kerry, were both behind it.
Republicans are moving to exploit the opening by denouncing the resolution and the U.N. and showing solidarity with Israel. Goal: Replace the Democratic Party as the most reliable ally of Israel, and reap the rewards of an historic transfer of Jewish political allegiance.
That Sen. George McGovern was seen as pro-Palestinian enabled Richard Nixon to double his Jewish support between 1968 and 1972.
That Jimmy Carter was seen as cold to Israel enabled Ronald Reagan to capture more than a third of the Jewish vote in 1980, on his way to a 44-state landslide.
Moreover, U.S. acquiescence in this resolution puts Bibi in a box at home. Though seen here as a hawk on the settlements issue, the right wing of Bibi's coalition is far more hawkish, pushing for outright annexation of West Bank settlements. Others call for a repudiation of Oslo and the idea of an independent Palestinian state.
If Bibi halts settlement building on the West Bank, he could cause a split in his Cabinet with rightist rivals like Naftali Bennett who seek to replace him.
Here in the U.S., the U.N. resolution is seen by Democrats as a political debacle, and by many Trump Republicans as an opportunity.
Sen. Chuck Schumer has denounced Obama's refusal to veto the resolution, echoing sentiments about the world body one used to hear on America's far right.
"The U.N." said Schumer, "has been a fervently anti-Israel body since the days (it said) 'Zionism is racism' and that fervor has never diminished."
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham says he will urge Congress to slash funding for the United Nations.
If the folks over at the John Birch Society still have some of those bumper stickers -- "Get the U.S. out of the U.N., and the U.N. out of the U.S.!" they might FedEx a batch over to Schumer and Graham.
May have some converts here.
Agreed. Speaking of would be kapos....
only the mossad with dual citizenship
Although he doesn’t come right out and say it, I am certain Buchanan also supports this resolution, plus anything else that would harm Israel. Although Pat was the “pre-Trump,” I’m glad Trump doesn’t embrace Pat’s anti-Israel disposition.
Nobody has ever provided proof that Obama is an American.
No, but Obama told us he was born a British subject because of his foreign national father and therefore he is not a natural born citizen and ineligible to be President, even if he was born in Hawaii.
The GOP wanted to run ineligible candidates, too, so they ignored the Constitution.
I think John Bolton said it best on Tucker Carlson’s show last evening. When asked by Ed Whatzizface, the guest host, whether Obama stabbed Bibi in the back, Bolton replied, “No! He stabbed him in the front!”
Ping
Can you imagine a fist fight one-on-one between Odungo and Bibi? That would be fun to watch! Bibi would have him down and out before Odungo could figure out which hand was his left and which hand was his right.
You’re absolutely correct.
The Republicans won’t get a majority of Jews, until the Jewish community abandons its worship of socialism.
This must be a joke. What "rewards" is Buchanan talking about here?
Dwight Eisenhower got 40% of the Jewish vote in the 1956 election. The Republicans have never matched that since then. The closest they got was the 39% for Reagan in 1980. Reagan actually got a smaller share of the Jewish vote in his 49-state landslide over Mondale in 1984 than he did against Carter in 1980. That's an indicator of a deranged, pathetic group of voters if I ever saw one.
24 days remaining...
" I have a phone and a pen " BHO ,
and if I can't physically be there, I have an 'auto-pen'
It's time for the O'Bungler sprint !!
We all know he is a gay, muslim,illegal, communist who like most terror types hates Israel. But few others know the detail we do here.
My guess is that when he leaves the Whitehouse he will become a fund raiser in chief.
So I wondered why is he endangering his fundraising when rich liberal jews are a huge target for him.
The liberal part was the key.
Israel now has a huge liberal contingent that is against bibi and other conservative jews.
El zero will play on this and will take these libs for every dime he can shake out of them.
In the end its still about the money.
So did British France and other so this to embarass O? Aggravate Bibi to expose something on O?
Something is going on behind the curtain that we are not aware of ......yet!
Zechariah 14:2 King James Version (KJV)
For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished;
and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
