Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Show us where the winner is reqiured to have 270 or more to win the office.
1 posted on 12/18/2016 2:57:44 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: crz

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxii


2 posted on 12/18/2016 2:58:35 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crz

And sends it to the house.......which will vote for trump

But all of tjis is moot. Trump will poll 305 tomorrow


3 posted on 12/18/2016 3:00:13 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crz

The 270 figure has to do with the majority required, and the number of electors there are.

As the number of states increased, the populations fluctuated, the number of electors would change, and the number needed to win would also change.

State electors are population proportional.


4 posted on 12/18/2016 3:02:16 PM PST by DoughtyOne (jcon40, "Are we be coming into the age of Sanity?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crz
Show us where the winner is reqiured to have 270 or more to win the office.

I think it follows from this:

"the person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed;"

5 posted on 12/18/2016 3:04:49 PM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crz

The 12 amendment says that the winner must have a majority of all votes in the electoral college, otherwise the top 3 candidates can be voted on in the House


6 posted on 12/18/2016 3:07:00 PM PST by RichardMoore (There is only one issue Life: dump TV and follow a plant based diet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crz

The interesting thing about the 12th amendment is the history behind it. Originally, the Constitution was written with the thought that we’d have no parties like bad old England. So the electors were to vote for two men to become President. The one who got the most votes would be President and the one who came in 2nd would be Vice President.

But parties did arise. In the election of 1800 Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr running as Democratic Republicans won against the Federalists. Jefferson and Burr received the same number of Electoral votes. Seeing his chance, Burr tried to steal the election (sound familiar?) by trying to drum up votes in the House to be elected President. Hamilton led the forces who opposed Burr and later Burr would pay him back by killing him in a duel.

So now the electors vote separately for President and Vice President. Under the old system Hillary! would be Vice President-Elect and wouldn’t that make for an interesting four years.


7 posted on 12/18/2016 3:15:34 PM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crz

You’re not very good at math, are you?


10 posted on 12/18/2016 3:39:09 PM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crz
"if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed;"

Currently there are 535 electors. 435 electors representing the total of congressional districts, and 100 electors representing the total number of US senators. 270 is the majority of electors.

12 posted on 12/18/2016 3:42:18 PM PST by SkiKnee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crz
Here is a quick graph of what happens tomorrow: What if Electors go rogue
18 posted on 12/18/2016 4:57:58 PM PST by bobsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crz

Well, not to get all Clintonian on you, but it depends on the meaning of “appointed”.

If 538 electors are “appointed”, you need 270 to win. If only 300 electors are “appointed”, you only need 151. Both of those things are very clear from reading Amendment XII.

But what if there are contested slates when Congress enters special joint session to count the votes? For example, let’s say Florida had sent two slates of electors to President of the Senate Gore in 2001, one from the Legislature, one from the Secretary of State under orders from SCoFLA.

How many “appointed” electors would there have been? 513, 538, or 563?


37 posted on 12/19/2016 7:06:21 AM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson