To: Mechanicos; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; stephenjohnbanker; Clintonfatigued; ...
LOL, probably shouldn’t have put yourself in the spotlight, eh Chrissie?
30 posted on
12/12/2016 7:47:20 PM PST by
Impy
(Toni Preckwinkle for Ambassador to the Sun)
To: Impy; Mechanicos; GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; stephenjohnbanker; Clintonfatigued
This clown is a real winner. Douche meets Bag.
31 posted on
12/12/2016 7:53:22 PM PST by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: Impy; InterceptPoint; Whenifhow; LucyT; potlatch; PhilDragoo; bgill; Jane Long; txhurl; ...
The root of the problem with this "loose cannon" Republican elector is that the Texas state Republican Party obviously didn't vet him thoroughly for reliability before it put him on the ballot as an elector.
I don't know what procedures they may have followed, but all electors have to be told that they have one simple job only, to vote on the appropriate day in the state capital for the party's candidates for president and vice president. It's an honorary position granted by the party organization. The electors have to know that they are rubber stamps, and creativity as an elector will not be tolerated.
If you want to mouth off on candidates and policies after the people of the state have spoken, you cannot be an elector, period. Run for some other position instead.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson